Clinical Research Directory

Novel Soft Tissue Augmentation Technique Using Free Gingival Graft Simultaneous With Posterior Mandibular Implant

Presence of keratinized tissue (KT) around dental implants, plays a crucial role in stability and health of peri-implant tissues. Several studies reported that, minimum of 2 mm keratinized tissue width is required to achieve long-term longevity. Insufficient keratinized mucosa leads to biofilm accumulation, soft tissue inflammation, eventually peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Hence, the aim of the present trial is to evaluate KTW gain, linear and volumetric changes in buccal soft tissue along with hard tissue alterations following implant restoration at sites treated either with delayed implant placement \& simultaneous FGG or the conventional FGG protocol prior to implant placement.

Efficacy of Collagen Matrix for Peri-implant Soft Tissue Phenotype Modification

A stable band of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is thought to minimize tissue recession and provide resistance against mechanical, chemical, and microbial challenges, thereby preserving peri-implant tissue health. Soft tissue augmentation is often employed to enhance the soft tissue phenotype in such cases. While autogenous grafts such as free gingival grafts (FGG) remain the gold standard, xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) have emerged as promising alternatives, offering reduced patient morbidity and surgical time. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of XCM versus FGG for soft tissue phenotype modification when performed during healing abutment connection around dental implants, with evaluations at both short-term (6 months) and long-term (1 and 2 years) intervals. Thirty participants will be recruited at Dubai Health Dental Hospital and randomly assigned to receive either XCM (test) or FGG (control) augmentation. Clinical assessments will be conducted at baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T2w), and at 1 (T1), 3 (T3), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) months post-surgery. The primary outcome is the change in KM width, measured from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction. Secondary outcomes include KM thickness, supracrestal tissue height, and soft tissue dimensional changes, assessed using intraoral scans (Trios 5) and superimposed STL files. Additional measurements include peri-implant soft tissue level and phenotype. PROMs will be recorded in the first postoperative week and at the 3-year mark using a visual analog scale (VAS). Clinical indices such as plaque index, bleeding index, and probing depth will be evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Marginal bone level changes and implant survival rates will also be tracked throughout the study period.

Effect of Modified Free Gingival Graft and Conventional Free Gingival Graft on Gingival Recession

The aim of this clinical study is to understand whether the modified free gingival graft technique is superior to the conventional free gingival graft: Will gingival recession completely close in modified free gingival grafting areas? Will there be a significant increase in the amount of keratinized gingiva in modified free gingival grafting participants compared to traditional free gingival grafting participants? Participants will visit our clinic in the 1st, 3rd and 6th months. Necessary clinical parameter measurements will be made by the clinician.