Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
3 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 3 Lack of Keratinized Gingiva clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT04179448
A Comparison of Side Access Mucosal Releasing Incision (SAMRI) and Sulcular Tunnel Access to Treat Gingival Recession.
This study will compare two incision designs to allow for coronal gingival/mucosal flap advancement and tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) graft around teeth with gingival recession and a lack of adequate keratinized gingiva. The SAMRI technique described is a novel technique involving a simplified incision and suturing technique and to the investigators' knowledge, this is the first study that seeks to compare this technique to other techniques for differences in clinical outcomes (percentage root coverage, resultant tissue thickness, and width of keratinized tissue) and patient-centered outcomes (post-operative pain, swelling, changes in daily activities, and patient-assessed esthetics) in a controlled study.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 99 Years
Updated: 2026-02-27
1 state
NCT07440303
Star Matrix vs Autogenous Graft for Gingival Augmentation: Split-Mouth RCT
This split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial will test whether a ready-to-use collagen membrane (Star Matrix) can widen the protective band of gum tissue (keratinized gingiva) as effectively as the standard free gingival graft harvested from the palate. Central question Can Star Matrix provide the same or better gain in keratinized tissue width-with less patient discomfort and chair-time-than an autogenous graft? Primary objectives Compare the 6-month increase in keratinized tissue width between Star Matrix and autogenous graft sites. Assess patient-reported pain and morbidity associated with each treatment. Secondary objectives Measure operative time, early healing scores, esthetic outcomes, and (optional) histologic quality of the regenerated tissue. Methods Twelve adults with ≤ 2 mm keratinized tissue on contralateral lower-jaw teeth will be enrolled. Each participant receives Star Matrix on one side and a conventional free gingival graft on the other. Follow-up visits at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks include clinical measurements, standardized photographs, and a 7-day postoperative pain diary. An optional 2 mm punch biopsy at 6 months is analyzed microscopically.
Gender: All
Ages: 20 Years - 80 Years
Updated: 2026-02-27
1 state
NCT05604391
The Effect of Free Gingival Graft on Root Closure
Free gingival graft is a mucogingival surgical technique applied to increase keratinized gingival width and reduce gingival recession. Free gingival graft is one of the most widely used approaches in root closure treatments and in increasing the height of the keratinized gingiva. Evaluation of the effect of the amount of creeping attachment on the root surface caused by the free gingival grafts placed coronally and apical to the mucogingival line on the gingival recession in the mandibular anterior region with keratinized gingival deficiency with gingival recession. Forty patients with gingival recession and insufficient keratinized gingival height will be randomly divided into 2 main groups as free gingival grafts to be placed coronal and apical to the gingival recession.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 99 Years
Updated: 2025-03-10