Clinical Research Directory

Fosamprenavir for Laryngopharyngeal Upper Airway Tissue Treatment and Enzyme Reduction

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) is a common condition that causes symptoms like chronic cough, throat clearing, hoarseness, and trouble swallowing. If not treated, LPR can lead to long-term throat damage and may increase the risk of throat cancer. More than 20% of the people in the United States are estimated to have LPR, yet there is no effective medication approved to treat it. Drugs called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often used to treat LPR, even though they were designed for stomach acid problems. These medications reduce acid but do not stop reflux from happening, so they often do not help LPR patients. Despite poor results, PPIs are widely prescribed, are very costly, and can cause side effects. Research shows that a digestive enzyme called pepsin plays a key role in LPR. Pepsin can damage the throat and voice box even when acid is not present. Laboratory studies found that certain HIV medications can block damage caused by pepsin. People taking these medications for HIV appear to have a much lower rate of LPR. This study will test fosamprenavir, an FDA-approved HIV drug, as a treatment for LPR. We will conduct a 14-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with LPR who did not improve with standard treatment. Participants will receive either fosamprenavir or placebo, randomly, and symptoms will be measured before and after treatment using standard questionnaires and daily symptom tracking. Because there is no effective medical treatment for LPR. this study aims to test a safe, existing drug that targets the underlying cause of the disease.

Comprehensive Analysis of the Swallowing Mechanism Using High-resolution Manometry With Impedance

The aim of this project is to perform a detailed evaluation of upper esophageal sphincter function and the swallowing mechanism in patients with swallowing disorders or suspected extraesophageal reflux using high-resolution manometry with impedance and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring.

The Johns Hopkins Heartburn Center Registry

A multi-center, multi-year registry of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) undergoing diagnostic evaluation and/or treatment of GERD and associated diseases and complications.

The Mechanism Versus PPI Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a mechanism guided strategy that utilizes a multidisciplinary approach to treat adults patients (age 18-89) with chronic throat symptoms who are undergoing clinical evaluation for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is more effective than the usual care strategy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy used in gastroenterology for these patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Will a greater proportion of the mechanism guided strategy participants achieve symptom response in comparison to the usual care strategy participants? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the mechanism guided strategy to usual care strategy to see if treatment response differs between the groups. Participants will be be asked to do the following: * participate in an 8-week blinded study phase where they will be randomized to either 1) Mechanism Guided Strategy or 2) Usual Care Strategy * take an oral capsule daily (omeprazole 40mg or placebo) * come to 3 in-person visits at UC San Diego Health for an intervention visit with a study provider * consider incorporating recommended lifestyle modifications * complete weekly surveys

Reflux Band in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

This 12 week biomarker targeted double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll subjects with salivary pepsin positive laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) to assess efficacy of the external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, also known as the Reflux Band. Subjects will be randomized to one of two arms: control or experimental. Following the 8 week intervention period subjects in both arms will continue in a 4 week unblinded period. The primary hypothesis is that a significantly higher proportion of subjects in the experimental arm will meet the primary endpoint for symptom response, compared to subjects in the control arm.