Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

7 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Leadless Pacemaker

Tundra lists 7 Leadless Pacemaker clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

RECRUITING

NCT07118358

BIOTRONIK Investigation of the LivIQ Leadless Pacemaker System

The objective of this Investigational Device Exemption trial is to confirm the safety and performance of the LivIQ leadless pacemaker system, in patients with a Class I or II indication for ventricular pacing (VVI/VDD) according to applicable guidelines. An integrated atrioventricular synchrony sub-study (AVS) is specifically designed to evaluate the AVS performance of the LivIQ system.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-04-06

2 states

Leadless Pacemaker
Bradycardia
AV Block
+1
ENROLLING BY INVITATION

NCT06837870

Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.

The study will be a randomized comparison of percutaneous suture-mediated closure (SMC) versus manual compression with a superficial figure-of-eight suture (MC) for large bore venous access used for leadless pacemaker implantation.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-03-27

1 state

Vascular Closure
Pacemaker Implantation
Leadless Pacemaker
RECRUITING

NCT07246135

Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten

The registry for leadless pacemakers will collect and annually analyze the data of all leadless pacemaker implantations at the University Hospital St. Pölten, including demographic information, indications, procedural details, acute, medium- and long-term complications during follow-up. Due to the partially novel nature of the signals (atrial mechanical sensing markers) and the lack of long-term experience to date, data on these aspects will also be collected and analyzed. This is a single-center, prospective and retrospective registry that includes all patients receiving a leadless pacing device, as well as all patients who received a leadless pacing device between January 2021 and the start of the registry. All patients undergoing implantation of a leadless pacemaker will be invited to participate in the registry. For patients to be included retrospectively, participation in the registry will be offered at the time of their next routine follow-up visit. The indication for leadless pacing will be determined by the physician responsible for the patient. Enrollment in the registry will in no case alter or influence the treatment the patient receives. Data collection will take place at the time of implantation and continuously during follow-up over the entire study period. Pacemaker-related data may be obtained either in person or via remote monitoring.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2025-11-24

1 state

Pacemaker
Leadless Pacemaker
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
+1
RECRUITING

NCT07106788

Aveir Leadless Pacemaker Japan PMS

The primary purpose of the PMS is to collect safety information on the Aveir DR leadless cardiac pacemaker (LP) system in a population indicated for de novo dual-chamber pacing. Additionally, the PMS will collect data on rollover patients from the Aveir DR i2i IDE, Aveir AR LP in patients indicated for single-chamber pacing in the right atrium, and upgradeability in patients implanted with single-chamber Aveir atrial or ventricular LP that require an upgrade to a dual-chamber Aveir LP.

Gender: All

Updated: 2025-08-28

7 states

Leadless Pacemaker
ENROLLING BY INVITATION

NCT06455566

Vascular Access for Minimally-invasive Leadless Pacemaker Implantation Through the Right Jugular routE

Leadless pacemakers (LP) are associated with a lower risk of revision compared with transvenous pacemakers. However, LPs implantation is associated with a 0.6% risk of complication at the femoral vein puncture site (e.g. arteriovenous fistula, haemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, etc.). As a consequence, the need for prolonged in-hospital monitoring after LP implantation though the right femoral (RF)vein is a barrier to same-day discharge. Recently, right internal jugular (RIJ) vein access has emerged an alternative to right RF vein access for LP implantation (with a regulatory approval for MEDTRONIC Micra LP). The aims of this registry are the following : * evaluate the feasibility of RIJ access for LP implantation; * confirm the acute and chronic safety of RIJ access for LP implantation; * compare RIJ to RF (historical cohort) vein access regarding procedural characteristics and outcomes; * evaluate the feasibility of same-day discharge avec LP implantation through the RIJ vein.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2025-03-26

Leadless Pacemaker
Same-day Discharge
NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT06702865

Combined Leadless Pacemaker and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry

Leadless pacemakers (LP) are safe and effective alternatives to transvenous pacemakers in selected patients. Implantation is performed with a large caliber delivery catheter. Care must be taken in introducing the delivery catheter into the patient's venous system. Implantation in patients with small body habitus demands extra caution to avoid vascular injury and cardiac perforation. Negotiating the large caliber delivery catheter into the desired implant position may also be more difficult in small right ventricles. In a previous report of Micra leadless pacemakers, it was found that low BMI was associated with poor efficacy and safety. The Aveir leadless pacemaker is a new leadless pacemaker that has obtained FDA approval and is commercially available in Hong Kong. It features a screw-in fixation mechanism, in contrast to the passive fixation of Micra. Most of its efficacy and safety data comes from a Western population. It would be important to study its efficacy and safety in an Asian population, who tend to have smaller body builds, hence more prone to complications. In recent papers regarding the Micra leadless pacemaker, it was found that tricuspid regurgitation (TR) could be a result, especially if the implant was too close to the tricuspid valve. Given the almost 50% longer device dimension of the Aveir VR compared with the Micra leadless pacemaker (38mm vs 26mm), it is expected that the device mechanical interaction with tricuspid valve dysfunction can be more common. In the smaller hearts of an Asian population, it would be important to study the TR progression after device implantation. About half of the patients implanted with leadless pacemakers were having concomitant atrial fibrillation and thus were at risk for thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion was an effective procedure for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Because one patient often has indication for both LAAO and leadless pacemaker, combining them into the same procedure is appealing. The combined procedure can be performed with one single access. The imaging used to guide LAAO implantation can also be used to guide leadless pacemaker implantation to improve the procedure safety. This study is a prospective observational study. Patients indicated for combined leadless pacemaker and left atrial appendage occlusion will be enrolled. Patients would fulfill guideline Class I and Class II indication for leadless pacemaker. The decision for left atrial appendage occlusion will be a shared decision-making process between the physician and patient. The consideration is usually based on patient's bleeding risk, tolerability for oral anticoagulation and patient preference.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2024-11-25

Leadless Pacemaker
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
RECRUITING

NCT06692218

Leadless Pacemaker Implantation Positions and Its Relationship with Procedure Efficacy and Complication

Leadless pacemakers (LP) are safe and effective alternatives to transvenous pacemakers in select patients. Advances in battery and electronics technology allow for the entire pacemaker system to be implanted into the right ventricle, bypassing many of the weaknesses of transvenous pacemakers. Traditionally leadless pacemakers have been implanted in the right ventricular (RV) septum to prevent cardiac perforation, and much emphasis is placed during implantation to ensure a septal implant. However, in Asians with smaller heart sizes, septal implantation may be unfeasible. Cases of RV free wall implant have been achieved without any complications. This study aims to examine patients previously implanted with LP and determine their final attachment location. If a substantial portion of complication-free patients had RV free wall implants, then it can be argued the additional effort to ensure a septal implant is unnecessary. Additionally, intraoperative data, such as the intracardiac electrogram, may contain parameters correlated with implant position. This study also aims to study this correlation to guide future implant procedures. This is a prospective-retrospective cohort study. Patients who will implant leadless pacemakers or already implanted leadless pacemakers since 1 Jan 2015 will be recruited. After the implantation, patients will be invited back for a noncontrast ECG-gated CT heart. It will be timed at the end diastole and a 3D reconstruction will be performed. The attachment of the leadless pacemaker to the RV will be adjudicated from the CT. The patients' pre-operative laboratory tests, baseline demographics, medical history, LP electrical data and pre- and post-operative medication regiment will be collected retrospectively from their medical records in the Hospital Authority's Clinical Management System (CMS) and Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS).

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2024-11-18

Leadless Pacemaker