Clinical Research Directory

DE-RESTRICT: Deimplementing Activity Restriction for Preterm Birth Prevention

DE-RESTRICT is a pilot study testing whether a strategy to reduce the use of activity restriction and bedrest in pregnancy is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for prenatal care providers, and whether it changes how often activity restriction is recommended. Activity restriction and bedrest are commonly advised to try to prevent preterm birth, but they do not prevent it and may cause harm, and national guidelines recommend against them. The study takes place at two prenatal care settings within one health system and unfolds across four periods. In the pre-deimplementation period the study team develops a local clinical guideline and measures baseline outcomes. In the run-in period most provider education is delivered through interactive sessions with feedback, and audit and feedback begins. In the maintenance period audit and feedback continues. In the post-deimplementation period audit and feedback continues and outcomes are measured again. The study measures provider acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, the rate of activity restriction recommendations, patient-reported wellbeing and care experience, and the preterm birth rate.

EVOLV-Rx VA: Evaluating Opportunities to Decrease Low-Value Prescribing in Community Living Centers

The investigators developed EVOLV-Rx (Evaluating Opportunities to Decrease Low-Value Prescribing), a novel clinical support tool to detect 18 evidence-based and clinically useful low-value prescribing practices in older adults. The objective is to conduct a hybrid study to assess the effectiveness and implementation of an EVOLV-Rx-based intervention to reduce LVP among older Veterans who reside in CLCs in VISN 4. In Aim 1, the investigators will conduct focus groups of VISN 4 CLC leaders, clinicians, Veterans, and family caregivers, where the investigators will characterize the patient, clinician, and CLC-level barriers to and facilitators of implementation; and identify and tailor strategies to optimize the intervention's adoption and implementation. In Aim 2, the investigators will conduct a hybrid type 2 effectiveness implementation trial to compare the intervention to usual care, using a stepped wedge design in five VISN 4 CLCs. The primary effectiveness outcome is the count of low-value prescribing practices per 100 Veterans. In Aim 3, the investigators will conduct an embedded process evaluation to study implementation processes, their impact on outcomes, and iteratively improve the implementation of the intervention. The investigators will also conduct semi-structured interviews of clinicians, Veterans, and family caregivers to characterize the appropriateness, feasibility, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of the intervention and implementation strategies employed.