Clinical Research Directory

Quad Helix vs RME for Posterior Cross-bite in Egyptian Children

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Quad Helix (QH) appliance versus Rapid Maxillary Expanders (RME) in treating posterior cross-bite in Egyptian children during the mixed dentition stage. The study will also assess patient comfort and pain levels associated with each appliance.

3D-Printed Versus Laboratory-Fabricated Hyrax Expanders

Maxillary expanders are orthodontic appliances that are commonly used to expand the upper jaw. The purpose of this study will be to compare the effects produced by two different maxillary expanders in children 8-13 years old. The first type of expander is made by hand in an orthodontic laboratory, and the second type of expander is designed on a computer and printed using 3D printers. Both expanders are already used in the MUSC Orthodontics Clinic. The purpose of this study is to see if the 3D printed expander is as effective as the traditional expander made by hand in the laboratory, with more comfort to the patient. Patients participating in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: group A will be treated with a laboratory-made maxillary expander, and group B with a 3D-Printed maxillary expander. Information will be collected on the participants' standard clinical follow-up visits including photos, x-rays, and dental photo scans over the course of 6 months to see how the expander is working. In addition, as part of the research study, the participant will be asked to complete online questionnaires with assistance from parents or guardians about his/her quality of life and perception of possible pain and discomfort at different time points. The potential benefits of this study include the use of 3D technology to improve the quality of the orthodontic treatment, with more comfort to the patient.

Three-dimensionally Printed Hyrax Versus Conventional Hyrax for Maxillary Arch Expansion in Adolescents

This clinical trial aims to compare the skeletal and dental effects of conventional Hyrax expanders and 3D-printed Hyrax expanders in adolescent patients with maxillary transverse deficiency. Using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital models, the study evaluates the precision, customization, and treatment outcomes of both appliance types to inform evidence-based orthodontic treatment planning.

Evaluation of Maxillary Expansion Methods on Nasomaxillary Structures

Maxillary transverse deficiency is an orthodontic anomaly characterized by the upper and lower dental arches being incompatible due to insufficient width of the maxilla. This condition typically manifests with clinical symptoms such as crossbite, crowding of teeth, and impaired respiratory function. Genetic factors, early primary tooth loss, mouth breathing, thumb sucking, and abnormal swallowing are among the causes of maxillary narrowing. Treatment options vary depending on the patient's age and the degree of suture closure. In pediatric and adolescent patients, rapid (RPE) or slow (SPE) orthodontic expansion can be achieved with palatal expansion appliances. However, in adult patients, due to the less flexible bone structure of the maxilla, methods such as surgically assisted expansion (SARME) or mini-screw-assisted expansion (MARPE) are preferred. Recent studies have shown that MARPE can be effective as a non-surgical alternative in young adults and can provide direct skeletal expansion without damaging the teeth.

Effects of Skeletal Anchored Maxillary Expander for Constricted Maxilla

The aim of study will be Evaluation of Effects of skeletal anchored maxillary expander for constricted maxilla with different patient's age