Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

6 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation

Tundra lists 6 Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

NCT06247098

Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation Bone Healing Using Autograft and Xenograft Compared to Xenograft Alone

To evaluate bone healing at 4 months after lateral sinus augmentation with a 4:1 ratio of autologous bone and xenograft or xenograft alone. A radiographic volumetric, histomorphometric, and histologic analysis.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-01-23

1 state

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
Dental Implant
Bone Substitute
+1
RECRUITING

NCT05495490

Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Internal Sinus Lifting in Delayed Implant Placement

The sinus lift technique through alveolar crest Osseodensification is conservative, minimally invasive, and minimally traumatic, utilizing hydropneumatic counterclockwise rotating instruments to lift the maxillary sinus floor without touching the Schneiderian membrane, thereby minimizing the risk of perforation. In contrast, the internal sinus lift technique utilizing osteotomes to raise the Schneiderian membrane eliminated hammering, making the technique more patient-friendly, with the placement of a graft biomaterial around the implant. The challenge in this technique was the availability of \> 5mm residual bone height preventing membrane perforation and low primary implant stability. Consequently, the investigator aims to compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of Osseodensification and Osteotome internal sinus lifting after delayed implant placement by assessing bone gain and bone density around implants radiographically, the primary stability of the implants clinically, and patient satisfaction.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 40 Years

Updated: 2026-01-21

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
ENROLLING BY INVITATION

NCT06902454

Evaluation of Crestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Densah Burs Via Surgical Guide and Simultaneous Implant Placement

Ten patients with missing maxillary posterior teeth and maxillary sinus pneumatization in this study .the floor of maxillary sinus will be elevated using densah drill via surgical guide with simultaneous implant placement . patients will be received, clinically and radiologically examined, and managed at the Oral and Maxillofacial surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-01-21

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
RECRUITING

NCT06507709

Closed Sinus Augmentation With a Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty

The goal of this clinical study is to learn if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or 3-dimensional x-ray can help to let the investigator know if dental implant placement can be done after performing closed sinus surgery. The study will look at the structure of your gum where the implant will be placed after performing the surgery using 3-D x-ray and compare that to how the structure of your gum looks 6 months later. The 3-D imaging will happen after standard of care surgery to prepare your gum for an implant and then 6 months later to verify that the site is ready for the implant.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 85 Years

Updated: 2025-11-12

1 state

Dental Implant
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
ENROLLING BY INVITATION

NCT07090694

PRF vs. Graftless Sinus Lift With Implant Placement

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of sinus floor elevation using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) compared to a graftless approach in adult patients with atrophic posterior maxilla (residual bone height 5-7 mm) requiring dental implant rehabilitation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does PRF enhance bone height gain more effectively than graftless sinus elevation? Does PRF improve implant stability and reduce marginal bone loss compared to the graftless approach? Researchers will compare the outcomes of PRF-grafted implants versus non-grafted implants to see if PRF improves radiographic and clinical results in single-stage implant placement. Participants will: Undergo internal sinus lift via crestal drilling approach Be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I: sinus lift without graft material Group II: sinus lift with PRF as the sole grafting material Receive simultaneous dental implant placement during the sinus lift Be monitored through clinical exams and radiographic imaging over 6 months postoperatively

Gender: All

Ages: 25 Years - 65 Years

Updated: 2025-07-29

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
Alveolar Bone Loss
Atrophy
+2
RECRUITING

NCT07035236

Evaluation of Tenting the Schneiderian Membrane of the Maxillary Sinus Using Titanium Mesh.

Twenty posterior maxillary edentulous sites requiring open sinus augmentation for staged dental implant placement will be studied. Group I (study group) the maxillary sinus membrane will be elevated using titanium mesh fixed by bone screws. Group II (control group) will have stainless steel screws/pins placed bucco-palatally to maintain the elevated membrane and stabilize the formed blood clot. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) will be placed at the site of elevated membrane in both groups.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 60 Years

Updated: 2025-06-25

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation