Clinical Research Directory

Developing and Testing Innovative Care Pathways for Screening and Treatment of OUD/PTSD in Jails

Opioid overdose is the leading cause of death among people recently released from incarceration. Recent evidence also shows a rise in stimulant use among justice-involved populations, as well as growing rates of concurrent opioid and stimulant use. Yet, while there is growing research on opioid use disorder (OUD), stimulant use disorder (STUD), and substance use treatment in jails and prisons, studies find that few people who are referred to community substance use treatment actually initiate treatment after release. But, emerging research suggests that therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a common and deleterious OUD and STUD comorbidity, could profoundly increase the likelihood of engagement with substance use treatment; however, this has not been tested in jails, and acceptable, appropriate, and feasible ways to identify and link people with probable PTSD and OUD/STUD in this setting to treatment are required to be able to examine this possibility. Therefore, this 4-year R33 aims to 1) describe engagement in and examine the implementation outcomes of an innovative approach to identifying and referring people with probable PTSD and OUD/STUD to needed treatment services and 2) the effectiveness and implementation outcomes of two competing models of subsequent trauma-focused therapy initiation timing (i.e., immediate initiation of therapy vs initiation upon community reentry) among people who demonstrate need for OUD/STUD services and who accept referral. To address Aim 1, the investigators will assess the implementation context for and subsequently implement a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment model that was adapted to identify and address the substance use and mental health needs of adults with probable PTSD and OUD/STUD in the jail setting (SBIRT-J) in the Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; the investigators will describe engagement in and examine the implementation outcomes of the SBIRT-J model via a summative evaluation guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Specifically, there will be a survey and interview jail stakeholders (e.g., jail leadership, officers) to understand perceptions of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the SBIRT-J model as well as SBIRT-J implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators), and use administrative data to understand the degree to which SBIRT-J is adopted during active enrollment in the R33 Aim 2 research trial and sustained in the 6 months after enrollment end. Fidelity to the SBIRT-J model will also be monitored and reported. To address Aim 2, the investigators will conduct a patient-randomized Hybrid type I implementation-effectiveness trial in which adults who are identified as having probable PTSD and OUD/STUD through the SBIRT-J model and who consent to participate in the trial are randomly assigned to either immediate initiation of therapy for PTSD in jail or initiation of PTSD therapy upon release. The primary effectiveness outcome will be post-release substance use treatment initiation by 6-months post-release from jail; secondary and exploratory outcomes will include substance use treatment readiness and retention, OUD/STUD severity, PTSD symptoms, victimization, overdose, and additional drug use. Participants in the effectiveness portion of the trial (N = 338; \~50% female) will be enrolled from the largest jail in Arkansas. Jail stakeholders will also be enrolled to provide implementation-related data. The overall goal is to translate research to practice to increase the provision of high-quality care for justice-involved persons with probable PTSD and OUD/STUD. Indeed, this study will be the first trial of a treatment for PTSD in jails as a method for improving OUD/STUD outcomes, providing foundational information on PTSD as a novel intervention target for meeting the needs of a particularly vulnerable population and providing the implementation data to inform rapid scale-up, if effective.

Integrated Care Versus Usual Care for Opioid Use Disorder and Infectious Diseases in Veterans

Opioid use disorder (OUD) confers a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting infectious diseases, which may have long-term health consequences in Veterans. Treatment of OUD with medication assisted therapy is highly effective, however this often occurs independently of infectious diseases care. This project will test out a new model that combines infectious diseases and OUD care within one VA clinic appointment. This new care model may improve the health of Veterans and reduce cost and time required for Veterans who often need to attend multiple outpatient appointments.

Injectable Buprenorphine in Prison: a Preference Trial

The goal of this pilot trial is to compare two branded extended-release buprenorphine (XR-B) formulations (Sublocade vs. Brixadi) to explore how they improve treatment retention after release from prison among incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are transitioning back into the community. The main question it aims to answer are: How do Sublocade and Brixadi compare in terms of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness? Does giving people a choice of medication affect how well they stay in treatment? Using a partially randomized preference trial approach, there will be a comparison between participants who choose their XR-B formulation to those who are randomly assigned to see if patient preference influences treatment outcomes. The trial is a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. Participants will: * Choose which medication they prefer or be randomly assigned if they don't have a preference. * Receive monthly injections of either Sublocade or Brixadi before and after release from prison. * Complete surveys and clinical assessments on treatment experience and acceptability. * Be monitored for treatment retention, opioid use, and adverse events for six months post-release. Researchers will compare the two treatments to see which one works better for people leaving prison and if allowing people to choose their treatment improves results.