Clinical Research Directory

The Feasibility of an Intervention Targeting Sources of Meaning in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Being diagnosed with heart disease can be a life-changing experience, often sparking existential questions and concerns about meaning in life. A lack of meaning in life has been found associated with increased emotional distress and decreased quality of life. Health professionals recognize that issues related to personal meaning in life are relevant but rarely address these aspects systematically in cardiac rehabilitation. This may be due to a lack of necessary tools. The project evaluates a novel, brief and structured intervention that aims to strengthen the experience of meaningfulness and reduce or prevent emotional distress by addressing personal sources of meaning in life among patients attending cardiac rehabilitation and their relatives in Denmark. The intervention is based on the Sources of Meaning Card Method, a method developed by Peter la Cour and Tatjana Schnell to map and explore personal sources of meaning (www.somecam.org). For the current project, the method has been adapted for a cardiac rehabilitation context. Three intervention formats are examined in a feasibility study in a municipal rehabilitation setting: 1) an individual format for patients in cardiac rehabilitation, 2) a dyadic format including a patient together with a relative, and 3) a group format for patients. Approximately 60 patients and 20 relatives are expected to participate. The study explores (a) participants' experience with and acceptability of the intervention formats; (b) changes in meaningfulness and emotional distress in a pre-post design; (c) recruitment and adherence rate, and (d) acceptability and practicality of the three formats among rehabilitation professionals.

Pilot Feasibility Trial of a Peer Support Program for Trauma Survivors

Traumatic injuries from events like car crashes, falls, or fires are a leading cause of disability. Survivors often face not only physical challenges but also long-lasting pain, mental health challenges and difficulty returning to work and family life. Although medical care focuses on physical recovery, survivors frequently report that their emotional and social needs are overlooked and unmet. Peer support-guidance from people who have lived through similar injuries-can reduce distress and improve coping. However, no programs in Canada currently provide peer support to trauma survivors across their recovery journey, from hospital to rehabilitation to community living. The investigators worked with trauma survivors, caregivers, and healthcare providers to co-design a Peer Support Program (PSP) that offers support throughout these stages. This pilot study will test whether the program is feasible and acceptable, and explore its early impact on recovery. Results will guide a future larger trial to expand peer support in trauma care.

School Violence Exposure as an Adverse Childhood Experience

This study hypothesize that school safety strategies may contribute to poor mental health and distress among various school populations and proposes the following research questions to be answered through this study: 1. Is there a significant difference in the prevalence of mental health outcomes, perceived school safety, and academic engagement between early adolescent and adolescent students (grades 6 - 12) at schools that have experienced a school shooting and those that have not? 2. Are existing interventions to promote school safety and security associated with poor mental health outcomes among students and school staff? 3. Does the strength of this association between school safety interventions and mental health outcomes differ among students and teachers in those schools who have experienced a school shooting versus among students and teachers in those schools who never experienced a school shooting? And, among our sample of students, are these associations moderated by their ACE history? Participants will be asked to self-report data on their mental health and wellness, and perceived school safety through a survey. Researchers will compare the surveys from the participants from exposure schools (those who experienced a gun shooting incident) with surveys from the participants from non-exposure schools (those who have not experienced a gun shooting incident)

The Family Foundations Trial

In this project, researchers are exploring different ways to support the wellbeing and relationships of families with young children (0-12 years). People in regional and rural communities often live with the threat of bushfires, floods, drought, severe storms, and other extreme weather events. Some families have been affected by these disasters and are still trying to recover. Researchers will test two different ways of supporting families in regional and rural Victoria: Family Foundations (FF): An 8-session program to promote parent wellbeing, parenting partnerships, and communication. All parents/caregivers/parenting partners in the family participate in sessions delivered by a health professional online. Family Life Check-In: A brief 30-minute telephone call with a health professional to discuss family wellbeing and relationships, and identify any supports needed. The goal of this trial is to learn whether FF works to reduce mental health difficulties for regional and rural families. The main question it aims to answer is: Compared to Family Life Check-In, does Family Foundations lead to fewer mental health difficulties? Participants will: Complete an online survey before randomisation, after they have received FF or Family Life Check-In, and six months after starting the project. Take part in either Family Foundations or Family Life Check-In.

The Relationships Between Equanimity, Mindfulness, and Self-Compassion, and Mental Health Outcomes

This is an academic research study aiming to explore the relationships between equanimity, mindfulness, self-compassion, and mental health outcomes, and to examine the reliability and validity of the new measures in Hong Kong.