Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
3 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 3 Mesenteric Artery Ischemia clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07274306
Incidence, Treatment and Outcome After Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in the Region of Västra Götaland, 2000-2023.
The goal of this retrospective observational study is to describe the incidence and outcome of patients diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) in the Västra Götaland region of Sweden between 2000-2023. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What was the observed incidence and outcome, and how did it change during the time period? * How did socioeconomic factors influence incidence and outcome of AMI? * What main surgical approaches were selected for these patients? * What was the distribution of anticoagulant use in the cohort, and what effect did the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have on incidence and mortality in AMI? * What was the prevalence of Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) after surgical intervention? Participants were obtained from the regional diagnosis registry. Additional datapoints were obtained from the Swedish statistics bureau and pharmaceutical registers.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-12-10
1 state
NCT06913530
European Multicentre Study of Long-term Results Following Visceral Arteries Revascularization: the E-VisAR Study
Visceral arteries pathologies are a broad-spectrum of conditions with an extremely low incidence, estimated at 9.2% and 6.2% per 100,000 inhabitants for chronic and acute mesenteric ischemia, respectively, and 0.01-0.2% for aneurysms. The literature regarding the topic is limited in number and fragmented, having multiple vessels involved along with rare conditions caused by different aetiologies. However, these diseases are of utmost importance considering that acute presentation is common and the treatment in urgent setting is challenging and still facing high mortality rates. There are still several grey areas regarding the treatment of these pathologies. The last decades showed an increasing utilization of an endovascular approach to treat visceral vessel diseases. On one hand, the early- and mid-term superiority of endovascular revascularization vs. open surgical repair has been demonstrated considering the reduction of morbidity and mortality, and length of stay. However, publications reporting long-term (\> five years) are still lacking. This study is a real-word, ambispective, multi-arm, multicenter study that aims to evaluate the long-term results of visceral vessel revascularization in different diseases, districts, and approaches. Patients will be divided according to the target vessel and index disease. For each subgroup, a comparison between endovascular and open repair will be performed. The primary outcome is to compare endovascular and open approach in terms of survival, further divided into overall and disease-related mortality, during long term follow-up (\> 5 years). Moreover, early and mid-term data should be considered to provide reliable results. This outcome will be stratified as well within each disease- specific arm. At the study launch, data collection of patients who have undergone visceral vessels revascularization in the previous 20 years will begin. At the same time, all new cases of visceral vessel revascularization will be proposed for enrollment and follow-up in the prospective arm. The retrospective cohort will provide informative results regarding the long-term survival of these patients. This information will be used to adjust the sample size for the prospective cohort.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-04-06
NCT06759727
Outcomes of Different Surgical Procedures After High Level Resection for Patients With Small Intestinal Gangrene
In this cohort study, aim to evaluate and compare short-term postoperative outcomes of different surgical procedures for patients with intestinal gangrene who underwent high level small bowel resection (\< 150 cm from DJ).
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-01-07