Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
7 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 7 Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma (mCRC) clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07463599
Safety and Efficacy of Tegavivint in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
This trial will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of tegavivint as monotherapy (single) and in combination with standard therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC).
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-03-11
1 state
NCT07224724
Exosome-derived Extrahepatic Metastasis Detection By Liquid Biopsy In Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy worldwide, and prognosis largely depends on how effectively metastatic disease is managed. The liver is the most frequent and prognostically important site of metastasis, and patients responding well to chemotherapy may become candidates for curative hepatic resection. However, the presence of extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) critically influences treatment eligibility and survival. Although clinical scores such as the Fong and Beppu systems include EHM as a determinant, its detection by imaging remains limited, especially for small or occult lesions. Accurate identification of EHM is also essential when considering liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), where EHM remains an exclusion criterion. The EXELION Study aims to develop a non-invasive diagnostic model using serum exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) to detect both hepatic and extrahepatic metastases in patients with CRLM. By integrating circulating miRNA profiling with machine learning-based analysis, this study seeks to supplement imaging diagnostics, improve treatment stratification, and enhance clinical decision-making for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-01-28
1 state
NCT05705492
Olanzapine for the Management of Cancer Associated Appetite Loss in Patients With Advanced Esophagogastric, Hepatopancreaticobiliary, Colorectal or Lung Cancer
This phase II trial tests how well olanzapine works in managing cancer cachexia in patients experiencing esophagogastric, hepatopancreaticobiliary, colorectal, or lung cancer that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic) -associated appetite loss while receiving non-curative cancer therapy. Loss of appetite ("anorexia") in the setting of cancer is a key feature of "cachexia," a syndrome associated with loss of weight and muscle as well as weakness and fatigue. Olanzapine is a drug that targets key neurotransmitters (a type of molecule in the central nervous system that transmits messages to the rest of the body) that may stimulate appetite, restore caloric intake, minimize weight loss, and improve quality of life (QOL).
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-01-21
1 state
NCT07334587
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between FOLFOX-6 and CAPOX in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
This randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of two commonly used chemotherapy regimens, FOLFOX-6 and CAPOX, in adults with metastatic colorectal carcinoma who are receiving chemotherapy after surgery at the Department of Oncology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. A total of 248 eligible patients aged 20 to 70 years will be enrolled using consecutive sampling and randomly allocated in equal numbers to receive either CAPOX or FOLFOX-6 according to standard dosing schedules. Participants will be followed for 3 months to determine whether meaningful differences exist between the two regimens in clinically important outcomes. The primary comparison will focus on disease progression within the follow-up period. Additional safety and treatment feasibility outcomes will include the need for chemotherapy dose reduction due to toxicity, treatment discontinuation, hepatotoxicity based on liver function abnormalities, diarrhea persisting for more than 3 days, and mortality during follow-up. The study hypothesis is that the outcomes of FOLFOX-6 and CAPOX differ in terms of effectiveness and adverse effects. The findings are expected to inform selection of a regimen that provides better disease control with fewer treatment-limiting side effects in the local clinical setting.
Gender: All
Ages: 20 Years - 70 Years
Updated: 2026-01-12
1 state
NCT07150403
Second-line Doublet Chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Plus Fruquintinib Versus Doublet Chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Plus Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
The standard second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) involves chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) combined with an antiangiogenic agent, such as bevacizumab or aflibercept. Maintaining VEGF inhibition between first and second-line treatments has shown modest clinical benefits, with exploratory analyses suggesting that bevacizumab is more effective in smaller tumors. The ULYSSE trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib, a potent antiangiogenic agent, combined with a doublet chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) in second-line treatment for BRAF wild-type, MSS mCRC patients who have failed prior treatment.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 80 Years
Updated: 2025-09-08
NCT07043387
Streamlining Radioembolization for CCC and Metastatic Liver Cancer
TARE uses radioactive microspheres (20-60 μm), which are trapped in tumors due to abnormal vasculature, while normal liver sinusoids (≤15 μm) prevent their passage. However, some microspheres may drain into hepatic veins and reach the lungs, risking radiation pneumonitis. Pre-procedural evaluation with angiography and nuclear imaging (MAA scan with SPECT/CT) is required to calculate lung shunt fraction (LSF). TARE is contraindicated if LSF \>20%, and may be used with caution if LSF is 10-20%. Findings associated with high LSF include large tumors, hepatic vein invasion, TIPS, and dysmorphic intratumoral vessels. In contrast, small or medium sized (\<7 cm) cholangiocarcinoma or metastatic liver cancers without hepatic vein invasion or dysmorphic vessels show consistently low LSF (\<5%). Over 10 years at SNUH, no cases of radiation pneumonitis have been observed in such patients. Therefore, "streamlining TARE" omits pre-procedural nuclear imaging for this group to reduce procedural delays, reserving nuclear imaging for patients who need it most. SIR-Spheres (SIRTEX) facilitate single-session TARE as they are provided in a bulk vial, unlike TheraSphere which requires advance preparation based on dosimetry. Protocol Overview : Procedure: Same-day angiography, cone-beam CT, and TARE using SIR-Spheres. Dosimetry: Lung shunt fraction is assumed as 5%, estimated lung dose is capped at 10 Gy. Tumor dose goal: 80\~400 Gy (around 250Gy)(single-compartment MIRD), or 300 \~ 1000 Gy (multi-compartment MIRD). minimal tumor dose by partition dosimetry : 100Gy Software: Simplicit90Y for planning, Y90 PET/CT the next day for post-treatment dosimetry. Follow-up: 1 year; additional treatments follow institutional guidelines. This streamlined approach maximizes efficiency while maintaining safety in selected patients.
Gender: All
Ages: 19 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-07-24
NCT06655142
OSCAR II STUDY - The ONCObind CTC Removal Study
This study is a Prospective Single Arm, dual cohort Open Label Feasibility trial to evaluate the initial safety and signal of efficacy of a novel extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) procedure in either mPDAC or mCRC refractory to systemic therapy. Site selection will be dependent upon the site's familiarity with extracorporeal blood purification platforms as well as the diagnosis and management of mPDAC and mCRC. Adults (18 years old and older, ECOG PS of equal or less than 2) with a diagnosis of either mPDAC as defined histologically (microscopically) as a "pancreatobiliary type" adenocarcinoma who experienced disease progression or not tolerating fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan- based regimens or prior treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel or are not candidates for chemotherapy or mCRC patients who experienced disease progression on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan as FOLFIRI and/or FOLFOX and/or XELOX and/or XELIR and/or FOLFOXIRI/FOLFIRINOX or who are not candidates for chemotherapy with at least 5 cells/mL CTCs in peripheral blood and/or portal vein.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-07-08