Clinical Research Directory

Minimally Invasive Prostate Interventions Registry (MIST Study)

This study is a multicenter prospective patient registry designed to evaluate clinical, functional, and safety outcomes after minimally invasive prostate interventions (MIST) performed for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The interventions included in this registry represent standard-of-care treatment options and may include Rezum water vapor therapy, UroLift prostatic urethral lift, Aquablation, prostatic artery embolization (PAE), iTind, transperineal laser ablation (TPLA), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), and transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT). The registry collects standardized data using a secure REDCap platform from participating international centers. Data elements include demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication use, laboratory parameters, prostate volume assessments, uroflowmetry, post-void residual measurements, patient-reported symptom scores, sexual function assessments, intraoperative details, complications (classified using Clavien-Dindo), and postoperative recovery parameters. Follow-up visits occur at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, with an optional extended follow-up at 72 months to assess long-term durability and reintervention-free survival. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate improvements in urinary symptoms (IPSS), quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual volume (PVR) following MIST procedures. Secondary objectives include assessing perioperative safety, catheterization duration, predictors of treatment success or failure, need for reintervention, and long-term preservation of continence and sexual function. This registry is observational and does not assign or modify any treatment. All procedures are performed based on local clinical practice and physician judgment. Prospective participants provide informed consent. Data collected will be used to generate real-world evidence to guide patient selection, optimize procedural outcomes, and compare clinical performance across different minimally invasive prostate interventions.

Comparing Outcomes Using 1 Versus 2 Kirshner Wire Fixation in Patients With Severe Hallux Valgus

Comparing the radiographic and functional outcomes by using a Minimal invasive procedure to treat Hallux Valgus ; Distal linear Metatarsal Osteotomy - 1 Kirshner wire fixation versus two Kirshner wire fixation

Reproducibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids

Hemorrhoids are vascular-elastic structures of the anal canal that contribute to continence. Their enlargement and descent lead to symptoms such as rectal bleeding and the sensation of anal swelling, known as hemorrhoidal syndrome. In advanced cases (Goligher Grade III-IV), surgery is the only effective treatment. Open excisional hemorrhoidectomy (OEH), based on the Milligan-Morgan technique, is the standard procedure. Although effective in the long term, it causes severe postoperative pain. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage. While widely used in specialties with small surgical fields, it has not yet been explored in anal surgery. Its advantages include reduced tissue injury and improved healing, although it presents a learning curve and an initially longer surgical time. The IDEAL framework evaluates surgical innovations in five stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Evaluation, and Long-Term Study. The IDEAL phase 2a is aimed at the optimization and technical definition of surgical innovation with a focus on continuous improvement based on real clinical practice, laying the foundation for broader and more rigorous subsequent studies. Since no previous studies on the application of MIS in OEH have been found, the investigators propose a study within Stage 2A of the IDEAL model to assess the reproducibility of this technique. The investigators believe its incorporation into open excisional hemorrhoidectomy could result in less postoperative pain and faster patient recovery.

High Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum PressUre for Parenchymal Transection in Minimally Invasive Major Liver Surgery

Minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery gain popularity as they facilitate postoperative recovery while achieving comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. No consensus on the application of pneumoperitoneum pressure in minimal invasive liver resections (MILR) has been reached yet, as prospective clinical studies are scarce. The positive pressure of the CO2 pneumoperitoneum reduces intraoperative blood loss during MILR alongside the development of new transection devices and advancements in inflow control. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on the other hand has been shown to decrease postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption in comparison to standard pneumoperitoneum, and international guidelines recommend the application of "the lowest intra-abdominal pressure allowing adequate exposure of the operative field rather than a routine pressure". Nevertheless, evidence for the application of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is only moderate to low, requiring additional studies to better define its safety. To address this oxymoron, the investigators conduct a randomized non-inferiority trial to investigate the effect of low in comparison to high-pressure pneumoperitoneum during the transection phase of major MILR on intraoperative blood loss while also evaluating the risk of embolic complications.