Clinical Research Directory

Ergonomic Evaluation of Exoskeleton Use in Transoral, Endoscopic, and Transcervical ENT Surgery: A Single Site Non-blinded Study

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether the use of an exoskeleton system can reduce musculoskeletal strain and fatigue during ENT surgical procedures in ENT surgeons performing transoral, endoscopic, and transcervical operations. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the use of an exoskeleton reduce musculoskeletal strain and muscle activity (measured via sEMG and MVC) during surgery? Does the use of an exoskeleton reduce subjective pain and fatigue in the neck, shoulders, and wrists during and after surgery? Researchers will compare surgeries performed with the exoskeleton to those performed without it to determine if the device reduces physical strain and improves ergonomic outcomes. Participants will: Perform ENT surgical procedures with and without the exoskeleton system Have surface EMG electrodes placed on the neck and shoulders to measure muscle activity Undergo maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) testing before and after surgery (including wrist assessments) Provide subjective pain/strain scores at regular intervals (every 10 minutes) during procedures Follow standard surgical preparation and positioning protocols while data are recorded throughout the operation

Virtual Reality Therapy for Wrist and Hand Injury Recovery

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to find out whether an early neuro-functional rehabilitation program using virtual reality and action observation can improve recovery after a traumatic injury of the wrist or hand that requires immobilization in a cast or splint. After a fracture or other traumatic injury, the wrist and hand often have to be immobilized for several weeks. This rest is necessary for the bone and soft tissues to heal, but it also has negative effects. The muscles become weaker, joint movement is reduced, and the sense of position and movement (proprioception) worsens. Immobilization also produces fast changes in the brain areas that control movement, which may slow down recovery and increase the risk of long-lasting pain, stiffness, and disability. This study will compare two rehabilitation programs: Control group: participants will receive conventional rehabilitation after the cast or splint is removed, following the usual care of the hand therapy and traumatology services. Experimental group: in addition to conventional rehabilitation, participants will follow a specific program that combines action observation therapy with immersive virtual reality (AOT+VR). During each session, patients will watch first-person videos of functional wrist and hand movements through a virtual reality headset and then practice these same movements. The program includes about 12 sessions of 45 minutes over 6 weeks, starting during the immobilization period and continuing after the cast or splint is removed. Adults between 18 and 70 years with traumatic injuries of the wrist and/or hand (such as distal radius, carpal or metacarpal fractures, or tendon and ligament injuries) who need immobilization for 2 to 8 weeks will be invited to participate. Researchers will measure: Sensorimotor cortical activity associated with action observation and execution using electroencephalography (EEG), pain, disability, and function of the upper limb using validated questionnaires, Physical measures such as wrist range of motion, grip strength, and proprioception, Psychological factors such as fear of movement and pain catastrophizing, Feasibility, adherence to the program, side effects, and patient satisfaction. The main hypothesis is that the AOT+VR program, started early during immobilization, will help maintain brain excitability, reduce pain and psychological barriers, and lead to faster and more complete functional recovery of the wrist and hand compared with conventional rehabilitation alone.