Clinical Research Directory

Evaluation of Gait Impairment and Correlation in Patients With DCM

This study aims to evaluate gait impairment in patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) before and after surgery using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor. By comparing IMU-derived gait parameters with traditional clinical assessment tools (e.g., Modified Ashworth Scale, mJOA, and GRASSP), the study seeks to determine the effectiveness and reliability of IMU sensors for assessing and monitoring gait improvement and neurological recovery in DCM patients. This study is conducted outside the United States and does not involve interventions or devices subject to U.S. FDA regulation.

Fusion Rates of 3D Printed Porous Titanium Cages in Three and Four Level ACDFs

The purpose of this trial is to assess fusion rates in 3 and 4 level ACDFs in patients implanted with DePuy Conduit 3D printed titanium cages supplemented with SKYLINE Anterior Cervical Plate System and 1 CC DBM. This will be a non-inferiority study, looking to show that Synthes Conduit 3D printed titanium cages fuse as well as cages.

Pilot Study of ZetaFuse™ Bone Graft for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to test the safety and preliminary performance of the ZetaFuse Bone Graft in patient requiring fusion of the C3-C7 vertebral bones due to pain or loss of neurological function. Participants will be treated with ZetaFuse during surgical intervention to reduce pain and the loss of neurological function.

Enhancing Recovery in Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

The investigators have spent the last decade uncovering unique metabolic and functional abnormalities in the brains of patients with spinal cord compression. Degenerative spinal cord compression represents a unique model of reversible spinal cord injury. In the investigator's previous work, they have demonstrated that cortical reorganization and recruitment is associated with metabolic changes in the brains of patients recovering from spinal cord compression and is correlated with recovery and improved neurological scores. The goal of this study is to combine a rigorous platform of clinical care that includes preoperative evaluation, surgery, and rehabilitation, with state of the art imaging techniques to demonstrate how rehabilitative therapy can increase brain plasticity and recovery of neurological function in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurological function will be carefully evaluated in two groups of patients, those receiving rehabilitation and those not receiving rehabilitation after spine surgery, and will be correlated with the results of advanced imaging.

Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES)

To date, no consensus exists on which anterior surgical technique is more cost-effective to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The most commonly used surgical treatment for patients with single- or multilevel symptomatic CDDD is anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). However, new complaints of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy commonly develop at adjacent levels, also known as clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP). It remains unknown to what extent kinematics, surgery-induced fusion and natural history of disease play a role in its development. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is thought to reduce the incidence of CASP by preserving motion in the operated segment. ACDA is often discouraged as the implant costs are higher whilst the clinical outcomes are similar to ACDF. However, preventing CASP might be a reason for ACDA to be a more cost-effective technique in the long-term. In this randomized controlled trial patients will be randomized to receive ACDF or ACDA in a 1:1 ratio. Adult patients with single- or multi-level CDDD and symptoms of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy will be included. The primary outcome is cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of both techniques from a societal perspective. Secondary objectives are the differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two techniques, as well as the qualitative process surrounding anterior decompression surgery. All outcomes will be measured at baseline and every 6 months till 4 years postoperatively. High quality evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of both ACDA and ACDF is lacking, to date no prospective trials from a societal perspective exist. Considering the ageing of the population and the rising healthcare costs, the need for a solid clinical cost-effectiveness trial addressing this question is high.