Clinical Research Directory

Artificial Intelligence Clinical Decision

The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of AI integration into clinical physical therapy clinical decision in improving cost effectiveness and clinical outcomes purposes of the study are: 1. Compare the effectiveness of AI driven and human driven clinical decision in physical therapy clinical practice on management of pain in myofascial pain syndrome. 2. Compare the effectiveness of AI driven and human driven clinical decision in physical therapy clinical practice on improving joint range of motion limitations in myofascial pain syndrome. 3. Compare the effectiveness of AI driven and human driven clinical decision in physical therapy clinical practice on improving muscle strength in myofascial pain syndrome. 4. Compare the effectiveness of AI driven and human driven clinical decision in physical therapy clinical practice on management of functional limitation in myofascial pain syndrome. 5. Compare the effectiveness of AI driven and human driven clinical decision in physical therapy clinical practice on cost-effectiveness in physical therapy management of myofascial pain syndrome.

Effect of Occlusal Splint on Head and Neck Muscles in Patients With Bruxism and Myofascial Pain

The study group will be selected from patients who previously presented with various temporomandibular disorder (TMD) complaints to the "Temporomandibular Disorders Clinic" of the Department of Complete and Removable Dentures at the Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University. During routine examinations, TMD-DC (Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) forms are completed to aid in achieving an accurate diagnosis. Subsequently, patients suspected of having TMD of masticatory muscle origin but without a definitive diagnosis are routinely referred for ultrasonographic (USG) imaging. Patients meeting these criteria will be included in the study. Participants will be divided into two groups. The first group will consist of patients who have already undergone USG imaging during their routine examination, have been definitively diagnosed with masticatory muscle disorders based on clinical and radiographic findings, and have initiated routine occlusal splint therapy in the clinic. The 12-week treatment process of these patients will not be altered in any way. At the final follow-up session after the 12-week routine treatment protocol, the TMD-DC form completed at baseline will be re-administered, and the two forms will be compared to evaluate changes in symptoms and pain levels. Another USG imaging will also be performed at this session. The second group, serving as the control group, will include patients who have previously undergone USG imaging during routine examination and have received a definitive diagnosis of masticatory muscle disorders based on clinical and radiographic evaluations, but have not yet begun treatment. Patients whose turn for treatment begins during the study period will be excluded from this group. At the end of the 12-week period, the TMD-DC form will be re-administered, and a second USG imaging will be performed. This process will not interfere with the patients' position in the treatment queue, and treatment will commence as scheduled. In the second USG session, changes in the thickness and elasticity of the masseter, temporalis, trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, and splenius capitis muscles will be assessed by comparing the two imaging records.

Efficacy of Adding Greater Occipital Nerve Block to Trigger Point Injection in Patients With Neck Pain

Study Title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adding Greater Occipital Nerve Block to Trigger Point Injection in Patients with Neck Pain Due to Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Purpose of the Study: This study aims to evaluate whether adding a Greater Occipital Nerve (GON) block to the standard trigger point injection treatment provides better pain relief and improves daily function in patients with neck pain caused by trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Trigger points are small, sensitive spots in muscles that can cause significant pain and discomfort. While both trigger point injections and GON blocks are common treatments for neck and head pain, it is not yet clear if combining these two methods offers better results. Why is this study important? Neck pain related to trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle is a frequent problem, but there is limited research on the effectiveness of combining trigger point injections with GON blocks. This study will provide important information on whether the combination therapy can reduce pain more effectively and improve patients' quality of life and ability to perform daily activities. Who can participate? Adults aged 18 to 65 years old Diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome (MAS) based on specific clinical criteria, including the presence of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle Experiencing neck pain lasting longer than 3 months Pain intensity rated 5 or higher on a scale of 0 to 10 Who cannot participate? Pregnant or breastfeeding women, children, elderly people, unconscious or critically ill patients Patients with allergies to local anesthetics or steroids Individuals with bleeding disorders or infections near the injection site Patients with serious psychiatric or neurological diseases, or other medical conditions that may affect study results Those who have recently received similar treatments or surgery for neck or shoulder problems Study Design and Procedures: The study will include 60 patients meeting the criteria, randomly assigned to two groups using a balanced randomization method. Group A will receive only trigger point injections into the upper trapezius muscle using a mixture of lidocaine and saline solution. Group B will receive both trigger point injections and an ultrasound-guided GON block, which involves injecting a combination of local anesthetics and steroid near the greater occipital nerve to reduce pain signals. Both groups will receive the same home exercise program focusing on stretching and strengthening neck muscles to support recovery. Patients will be encouraged to perform these exercises regularly and will be followed up weekly by phone to check their progress. The doctor assessing patients' progress will not know which treatment the patient received, to ensure unbiased results. Assessments: Patients will be evaluated at three different times: before treatment, 1 week after treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment. Assessments include: Pain intensity and quality (using Visual Analog Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire) Neck disability and ability to perform daily activities (Neck Disability Index) Quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile) Neck joint movement and position sense (using clinical tests with special equipment) Posture evaluation (measuring head position using photography) Expected Outcomes: The main goal is to determine if the combined treatment of trigger point injection plus GON block is more effective than trigger point injection alone in reducing pain, improving neck function, and enhancing quality of life. Duration and Follow-Up: The study is planned to last 12 months. Patients will be closely monitored during and after treatment to ensure safety and to collect necessary data. Potential Benefits and Risks: Participants may experience pain relief and improved function if the combined treatment is effective. Risks include mild discomfort or side effects related to injections, which will be minimized by experienced medical staff.