Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
3 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 3 Neck Dissection clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07283861
Axoguard HA Plus Nerve Protector to Reduce Post-operative Neck and Shoulder Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Neck Dissection
In this prospective study, patients with head and neck cancers undergoing neck dissection will have the nerve to the shoulder wrapped with the Axoguard HA+ Nerve Protector at time of surgery. In these patients, the presence and severity of neck and shoulder dysfunction on the operated side will be assessed approximately twelve months post-operatively. The investigators hypothesize that shoulder nerve wrapping with the Axoguard HA+ Nerve Protector will lead to clinically meaningful improvement of shoulder function.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-12-23
1 state
NCT07074392
Assessing Spinal Accessory Nerve Recovery After Post-operative Electrical Stimulation
Shoulder weakness and pain are common after neck dissection surgery for head and neck cancer. This is often caused by injury to the spinal accessory nerve, which controls important shoulder muscles. Recovery can be slow and incomplete, affecting patients' ability to return to daily activities. This project will test whether a brief, low-dose electrical stimulation treatment can help the nerve heal faster and improve shoulder function. The treatment is applied during surgery and is safe, non-invasive, and quick to deliver. If successful, this approach could lead to better rehabilitation, less disability, and improved quality of life for patients undergoing cancer surgery. The project also supports the development of new medical technology and offers a pathway to expand the use of electrical stimulation in other nerve injuries.
Gender: All
Updated: 2025-08-19
1 state
NCT05806073
Elective vs Therapeutic Neck Dissection in Treatment of Patients With Clinical T1/2N1M0 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Cervical lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Therapeutic neck dissection (I-V region) has always been regarded as the standard scheme of neck surgery for patients with cN+ OSCC and however, it has brought obvious side effects, which seriously affects the postoperative quality of life of patients. In addition, excessive neck lymph node dissection will also affect the local immune function of patients to some extent and reduce the body's response to immunotherapy. Lymph node metastasis of primary oral squamous cell carcinoma follows certain rules. Most of the metastatic areas are I-II, and low-level metastasis is very rare. Therefore, more than 90% of patients with cN+ oral squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone Therapeutic neck dissection may have suffered from "excessive dissection of area of IV and V". Both the long-term clinical experience of surgeons and a large number of recent retrospective studies show that elective neck dissection (I-III region) is safe enough for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of cN1 and part of cN2.There is clearly a need therefore for a large randomized trial that will resolve the issue either way once and for all.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2023-04-12