Clinical Research Directory

Non-inferiority Study Comparing Salvage Pelvic Radiotherapy in 25 Fractions (62.5 Gy/25) Versus 20 Fractions (52.5 Gy/20) for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Surgery.

Study Overview This research compares two types of post-operative salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for men with prostate cancer who have had surgery but show signs of recurrence (detectable PSA). The goal is to see if a shorter treatment schedule is as safe and effective as the standard schedule. Why is this study important? After prostate surgery, cancer can return in up to 70-80% of high-risk patients. Radiotherapy helps control this, but the best way to deliver it-especially the number of sessions and whether to treat the pelvic area-is still being studied. Shorter treatments could mean less time in therapy and better quality of life, if such treatments are proven safe. What is being compared? Standard treatment (Arm A): 25 sessions (about 5 weeks) Prostate bed: 62.5 Gy Pelvis: 45 Gy Shorter treatment (Arm B): 20 sessions (about 4 weeks) Prostate bed: 52.5 Gy Pelvis: 43 Gy Both groups may also receive hormone therapy (ADT) for 6-24 months. Main Goal To check if the shorter treatment causes no more side effects (urinary or bowel problems) than the standard treatment, while keeping cancer control similar. Other Things to be Measured Cancer control (PSA levels, spread of disease) Survival Quality of life (urinary, bowel, sexual health questionnaires) Who can join? Men who: Had prostate surgery Have a detectable PSA (≥0.2 ng/mL) No distant metastasis Are in good general health (ECOG 0-2) How long will the study last? About 12 years total: 2 years to enroll patients 10 years of follow-up

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation With IMRT in Early Breast Cancer

This study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of accelerated partial breast irradiation (ABPI) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in low-risk breast cancer treat with breast-conserving surgery.

Dose Finding Study of Zanzalintinib With Pembrolizumab and Cetuximab in Head and Neck SCC

This Phase I clinical trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, and optimal dosing of Zanzalintinib in combination with Pembrolizumab and Cetuximab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M HNSCC). The study aims to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) while also exploring efficacy outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab With Chemoradiation for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligometastatic Cervical Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluation the efficacy and safety of iparomlimab and tuvonralimab, paclitaxel + cisplatin/carboplatin combined with radiotherapy of locally recurrent and oligometastatic cervical cancer.The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the combination therapy improve the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety in participants? 2. What are the predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy, and how can this information better guide the use of immune-oncology drugs in combination therapy? Participants will: * Receive iparomlimab and tuvonralimab, Paclitaxel + Cisplatin/Carboplatin and radiation therapy according to a specified protocol. * Visit the clinic for regular checkups and tests throughout the treatment period. * Be monitored for and have records kept of ORR, PFS, DCR, OS, and safety. * Provide hematologic、tissue and stool samples to explore biomarkers. This study will help determine if this combination therapy can become a new standard of care for patients with locally recurrent and oligometastatic cervical cancer as well as identify biomarkers to better guide treatment strategies.

Cadonilimab With Chemoradiation for Recurrent and Oligometastatic Endometrial Carcinoma

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent and oligometastatic endometrial carcinoma. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the combination therapy improve the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety in participants? 2. What are the predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy, and how can this information better guide the use of immune-oncology drugs in combination therapy? Participants will: * Receive cadonilimab, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation therapy according to a specified protocol. * Visit the clinic for regular checkups and tests throughout the treatment period. * Be monitored for and have records kept of ORR, PFS, DCR, OS, and safety. * Provide hematologic and tissue samples to explore biomarkers. This study will help determine if this combination therapy can become a new standard of care for patients with locally recurrent and oligometastatic endometrial carcinoma, as well as identify biomarkers to better guide treatment strategies.

Multicenter Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness and Safety of Instillation of BCG and Alternative BCG Protocols for Intermediate and High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Previous studies have reported the efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) combined with other drugs for the treatment of bladder cancer. However, research on the combination of tislelizumab and BCG for bladder cancer treatment has largely been retrospective. Currently, ongoing clinical trials have not discussed the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with BCG instillation in reducing postoperative recurrence in intermediate-risk NMIBC. Therefore, this study aims to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with BCG in the treatment of intermediate and high-risk NMIBC. For this purpose, investigators have established strict screening criteria to include eligible patients in the study and have recruited suitable patients from multiple medical centers.Investigators have also developed a meticulous implementation process and follow-up considerations, hoping to better verify the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined use of these two drugs.