Clinical Research Directory

USG-Guided Shoulder Injections in Frozen Shoulder

Frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) is characterized by pain and a progressive restriction of both active and passive shoulder range of motion, significantly impairing daily activities and quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of USG-guided shoulder injections, when added to a home-based exercise program, in the conservative management of patients with chronic, painful frozen shoulder. In this prospective randomized study, patients diagnosed with painful frozen shoulder will be included. In addition to a standardized home-based exercise program, patients will receive either USG-guided suprascapular nerve block alone or a combination of suprascapular nerve block and subacromial injection. The effects of these approaches on clinical outcomes will be assessed over a 20-week follow-up period. Primary outcome measures include pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional status evaluated by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and shoulder range of motion. Secondary outcomes include depression level (Beck Depression Inventory), sleep quality, pain phenotype (nociplastic, neuropathic, or nociceptive), hand grip strength, ultrasonographic findings ( (coracohumeral ligament thickness, subacromial bursa thickness) , and patient satisfaction (subjective impression of improvement). The results of this study are expected to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness and additional benefits of different shoulder injection approaches when combined with home-based exercise therapy in patients with chronic frozen shoulder.

Efficacy of Chemically Distinct Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Pain Phenotypes in Adhesive Capsulitis

Patients aged 18-75 years who present to a tertiary rehabilitation hospital with shoulder pain and restricted range of motion, and who consent to participate, will be included in the study. Eligibility will be determined based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive one of several nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with differing chemical properties (e.g., diclofenac, meloxicam, or indomethacin), in combination with a home-based exercise program for shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Patients' sociodemographic data, as well as detailed clinical and examination findings and baseline outcomes, will be recorded. Patients will be informed about their condition, and modifications to activities of daily living will be recommended.Patients' pain phenotypes (nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic) will be categorized based on clinical history and questionnaires, and it will be determined which pain types derive greater benefit from NSAIDs. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at the end of the first and second weeks. At the first-week follow-up, pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). If the treatment is deemed effective (defined as a ≥3-point reduction or ≥50% decrease in VAS), the same NSAID will be continued for an additional week; otherwise, it will be switched to an alternative NSAID with a different biochemical profile (group). The outcomes assessments will be performed by a blinded evaluator to minimize bias.

Vestibular Innovation in Pain 2

Fibromyalgia is the most common centralized pain disorder, affecting up to 3% of the population. Current treatments are incompletely effective, often poorly tolerated, and costly: there remains an urgent need for novel, effective, and well-tolerated therapy. Preliminary data suggests that vestibulocortical stimulation (VCS), or irrigating the external ear canal with temperate water, could rapidly improve pain and quality of life in this cohort. The VIPR trial will assess the efficacy of a single session of VCS - a safe \& cost-effective bedside technique using a plastic syringe and temperate water - relative to sham in treating pain \& improving quality of life using validated patient-reported outcomes.

Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Chronic Primary Pain

Approximately 30% of adult Norwegians experience chronic pain, with its prevalence rising across demographics, including children and adolescents Chronic pain contributes to significant personal suffering and substantial societal costs. Traditional treatments - physical, pharmacological, and surgical - as well as psychological interventions, such as cognitive and acceptance-based therapies, demonstrate only minor to modest effects. To address the challenge of rising demand alongside limited treatment options, university hospitals must consistently evaluate and adopt new, potentially effective therapies to meet their societal mission. Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT) is one such innovative treatment that has recently demonstrated promising results for a subset of chronic pain patients in a U.S. primary care setting. In this study, the investigators want to assess the effectiveness of PRT on various outcomes in patients with primary chronic pain that has a likely nociplastic pain mechanism, within a Norwegian primary care population. The insights from this study will be important for any prospective implementation of PRT to align with one of the guiding principles of the Norwegian healthcare system: the Best Effective Level of Care (BEON principle). The BEON principle supports the delivery of high-quality, cost-effective healthcare services and is founded on the notion of seamless integration across different levels of care. When competence or resources at the primary healthcare level are insufficient, more patients tend to be referred to higher, specialized, and inherently more costly levels of care, such as secondary and tertiary care. Therefore, if the study can demonstrate that PRT is effective within a Norwegian primary care population, the hypothesize is that its implementation could strengthen both primary and tertiary care in alignment with the BEON principle.

Efficacy of Home-delivered Transcranial Direct Electrical Stimulation or Chronic Pain

This clinical investigation aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a home-based device providing electrical stimulation of the brain named transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS ) , in patients with chronic pain who have been transiently relieved by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered at hospital (less than one month benefit). The general objective is to show that these patients may best benefit from home based tDCS while rTMS performed in hospital has only limited and transient efficacy. Each participant will be randomized into one of two arms to receive during 3 months either active tDCS or sham tDCS. Neither the investigator nor the patient will be aware of the treatment. The efficacy will be assessed on pain intensity (primary outcome at 3 months) and several secondary outcomes (qualify of life, pain symptoms , global impression of change, pain relief, sleep, anxiety, depression) every month for up to 3 months. Safety will be assessed at each follow up visit for up to 3 months. The participants will be asked to self stimulate themselves with the device 5 days per week for about 20 minutes.

Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments for Chronic Pain in Adolescents: ACT and Pain Education.

One in four children in Sweden experiences chronic pain. For many, the pain is temporary, but for about 5% it significantly affects daily life, leading to sleep problems, school absence, and reduced physical activity. Youth with chronic pain report lower life satisfaction and overall health compared to their peers. In most cases, there is no underlying disease or injury, suggesting that chronic pain is a condition in itself, driven by dysregulation in the pain system and influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. National guidelines in Sweden recommend cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for children and adolescents with chronic pain and substantial functional limitations. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to strengthen the evidence base for these treatments. The investigators' clinic has developed and evaluated ACT-based treatments for pediatric chronic pain over the past two decades. The protocol has now been adapted into an internet-delivered version to increase accessibility. In a preliminary feasibility study, the investigators observed promising effects on pain interference, though some usability issues have since been addressed. The treatment is grounded in the fear-avoidance model, which explains how avoidance of pain-related activities can worsen disability over time. In ACT, such avoidance is seen as driven by unwanted thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations. The aim of treatment is to help young people relate more flexibly to pain and fear and to move toward personally meaningful goals - a skill referred to as psychological flexibility. Exposure is a core component of ACT, encouraging patients to engage with avoided thoughts, feelings, and activities in order to reduce avoidance and improve functioning. In addition to treating the young person, the study also targets parental behaviors. Parents often respond to their child's pain by increasing protection and monitoring, which is natural but can sometimes contribute to further avoidance and reduced independence in the child. ACT-based parent support is designed to help caregivers support their child more effectively. In this randomized trial, internet-delivered ACT will be compared to two control conditions: (1) an active comparator involving online pain education, and (2) a passive control group on a wait list. The pain education intervention is based on Pain Science Education (PSE), which aims to shift how individuals understand their pain - from seeing it as a sign of injury to recognizing it as a false alarm in the nervous system. PSE has shown promising effects in adults, but research in youth is still limited, and no RCTs have yet been published. The study responds to the need for well-designed digital interventions that reach more young people, evaluate treatment components more clearly, and include comparison groups that also receive digital interventions. The goal of the study is to further improve treatment effects by (1) emphasizing exposure strategies to reduce avoidance, (2) expanding pain education to enhance treatment understanding, and (3) refining parent support to better help families manage chronic pain over the long term. The project aims to increase knowledge about the effects of psychological treatments - in this case delivered online - for adolescents with chronic pain. As previous studies have highlighted the promise of exposure-based strategies and digital accessibility, the study aims to evaluate the effect of a treatment that combines and optimizes both. The study also aims to better understand the specific impact of pain education as a stand-alone intervention, as this is a growing research field with limited studies in youth. Regarding the parent support component of ACT, the study will evaluate whether changes in parental behaviors related to their child's pain are associated with reduced parenting stress and improved functioning and quality of life in the adolescents. In addition to evaluating treatment outcomes, the study aims to explore the underlying processes that may contribute to the effects of ACT and pain education.

Multimodal Imaging and Biospecimen Collection for Low Back Pain (LBPB)

This prospective cohort study investigates the neurobiological, genetic, and psychosocial mechanisms underlying acute and chronic low back pain (LBP). Core objectives include establishing a high-quality biobank to support future research in connectomics, genomics, and biomarker discovery, and identifying predictors of pain progression and treatment response. The study will also assess the impact of comorbid conditions such as anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances on pain perception and clinical outcomes. Longitudinal analyses will explore the dynamic interplay between emotion, cognition, sleep, and pain to inform precision, mechanism-based interventions. Functional imaging will be used to examine brain responses to nociceptive modulation, aiming to identify neural circuits involved in pain chronification. By integrating multimodal data-including neuroimaging, neurophysiology, microbiota profiling, polysomnography, and molecular assays-the study will define LBP subtypes, with a particular focus on nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic mechanisms. The ultimate goal is to establish prognostic biomarkers and advance personalized strategies for LBP prevention and treatment.

Effects of Aerobic and Strength Exercice on Nociplastic Pain in Temporomandibular Disorders

Chronic temporomandibular disorders are common in the general population. Nociplastic pain seems to be present in this pathology, with an hypersensitivity to touch, pressure and movement observed in both local and remote areas, as weel as comorbidities such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, difficulty to focus attention and memory disturbance. The best evidence-based treatment of temporomandibular disorders consists in combining education, manual therapy and therapeutic exercise in both temporomandibular and cervical regions. Aerobic and strength exercises showed to be effective in subjects with chronic pain and nociplastic pain, by inducing an hypoalgesic effect. However, there isn\'t investigation about the effects of theses types of exercise in subjects with temporomandibular disorders and nociplastic pain. Thus, the aim of the study is to determine if adding aerobic or strength exercise to an effective physical therapy programme is more effective than physical therapy alone to improve nociplastic pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorders.

Different Treatments in Chronic Pain Patients.

The goal of this observational study is to compare different treatment options in a chronic pain population. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the effectiveness of the different therapy options in the pain center of Sint-Lucas on outcomes related to pain and disability? * What are predictive factors for the different therapy options in the pain center of Sint-Lucas? Which factors predict improvement in pain related outcomes? Participant data will be gathered as part of their routine care. They can be advised to 4 different treatment options: * Consultations with the pain specialist * Interventions by the pain specialist (infiltrations, denervations) * Baxter therapy * Interdisciplinary treatment Researchers will compare patients with different dominant pain mechanisms to see which treatment are most effective for which dominant pain mechanisms.