Clinical Research Directory

Impact of Aerobic Exercise on the Anticancer Immune Response in Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine to what extent anticancer immune cells mobilized by aerobic exercise exhibit migratory and functional capacity towards cancer cells in patients undergoing treatment for breast or colorectal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Do anticancer immune cells mobilized by aerobic exercise will display migratory and functional capacity in patients undergoing treatment for curable breast or colorectal cancer? Hypothesis: exercise will promote cell migration and these cells will display anti-cancer functional characteristics, suggesting a possible adjuvant and immunotherapeutic use of exercise. • Do the magnitude of this anti-cancer immune response to exercise depend on the intensity of exercise? Hypothesis: the achievement of a higher intensity of effort will enable greater mobilization of the cytotoxic lymphocytes of interest, but also the expression of markers predicting a more interesting adjuvant potential to immunotherapy. Researchers will compare the effect of two exercise sessions, one moderate-intensity continuous exercise session (MOD) and one high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) on the migration and anticancer potentials of mobilized immune cells. Individuals aged between 40 and 70 with curable colon or breast cancer will be recruited to carry out a cross-over study with two experimental conditions. After a preliminary assessment visit, they will take part in: * Two familiarization visits to validate the exercise prescription * Two experimental visits (HIIE and MOD). During these conditions, blood samples will be taken before, after and 1 hour after the end of exercise to collect immune cells in the blood. At the end of the visits, participants will leave with an accelerometer to wear for three days depending on conditions, and a notebook containing a questionnaire to assess fatigue levels over the same three days.

Prospective Monocentric Study Evaluating the Circulating NK Cells Phenotype and the ImmunoScore® in Patients With Non Metastatic Rectal Cancer

Until 2020, the standard treatment for rectal cancer was a combination of radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy based on IV or oral 5FU, with a low complete response rate. The randomised phase 3 PRODIGE 23 trial evaluated a regimen of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy prior to neoadjuvant RTCT, with 3-year disease-free survival as the primary endpoint. Patients in the PRODIGE 23 arm had significantly better 3-year disease-free survival (76% versus 69%; p=0.034) and 3-year metastasis-free survival (79% versus 72%; p=0.017) than patients in the standard arm, and the complete histological response rate to neoadjuvant treatment (ypT0N0) doubled from 12% in the standard arm to 28% in the PRODIGE 23 arm. The main benefit of surgical de-escalation is to improve patients' quality of life. The main obstacle to the non-surgical management of these patients with a complete response after RTCT was the impact on survival in the event of local recurrence. Habr-Gama et al. showed that the WW strategy, combined with close follow-up, resulted in excellent disease control in the event of local recurrence, with organ conservation in almost 80% of patients. The selection of patients eligible for this non-surgical treatment (Wait and Watch WW) remains the main issue, which is why some physicians are still reluctant to adopt it. The immune cells known to be involved in the anti-tumour response are T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and Natural Killers (NK). These cells play a crucial role in the initiation, development and progression of cancers. They are naturally considered as potential targets for immunotherapy, but also as biological markers. In several tumour types, particularly colorectal cancers, it has been shown that a CD8+ lymphocyte infiltrate in the tumour is associated with a better prognosis. NK cells have also been studied in the circulating blood of colorectal cancer patients and have been shown to be predictive of 3-year survival. These results suggest that prognosis may depend more on the quality of the anti-tumour immune response than on clinical parameters. The prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum is essentially estimated by TNM uicc staging. It needs to be better estimated in order to adapt treatments to the risk of relapse. The beneficial effect of the immune response developed by the patient against colorectal tumours is certainly an important area of research. The INSERM U1183 unit is developing a technology for analysing blood NK cells and their phenotype, including those acquired by trogocytosis (WO/2016/005548). The aim of our study will be to compare the phenotype of circulating NK cells in patients with rectal cancer before, during and after treatment, and to study the relationship with relapse-free survival and the rate of complete clinical response in non-operated patients and histological response in operated patients. A clinically applicable immunological test called 'Immunoscore®' quantifies the density of two types of immune cells in the tumour and its invasion front: total T lymphocytes (CD3+) and killer lymphocytes (cytotoxic CD8+). The aim of the international study published in The Lancet was to assess the prognostic value of the Immunoscore test in patients with colon cancer. Given the major performance of this test in colorectal cancer, researchers are currently evaluating the Immunoscore test in rectal cancer and studying its ability to predict response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. El sissy et al. reported very encouraging results on the predictive value of the test for rectal tumours in complete response after radio-chemotherapy.