Clinical Research Directory

An Exploratory Physiological Study of Post-operative Recovery in Surgical Neonates and Dimethylarginine:Arginine Levels

The SuNDiAL study will measure levels of two naturally occurring amino acids: Arginine and Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) in neonates undergoing abdominal surgery in the first 5 days of life due to congenital abdominal malformations as the participants recover from surgery. The investigators hypothesise that the relationship between Arginine and ADMA may be useful in predicting recovery and complications in babies who have had abdominal surgery due to previous research published in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery. If this relationship is found to be useful there may be options for developing treatments (such as arginine supplementation) in the future to improve recovery and reduce complications in neonates undergoing abdominal surgery. Neonates born after 35 weeks gestation who have a congenital abdominal malformation who require abdominal surgery in the first 5 days will be eligible to participate in the SuNDiAL study. Arginine and ADMA will be measured from blood samples that are left over from the participant's blood tests that are taken as part of their routine clinical care. The investigators will measure Arginine and ADMA preoperatively and at least 10 points in the 30 days following their surgery, or until the participant fully recovers from surgery (which ever comes first). There is no intervention in the SuNDiAL study, and there will be no extra blood or blood samples taken. Serums samples that are left over from the babies routine clinical blood tests will be stored securely in the hospitals laboratory until analysis for Arginine and ADMA. The levels of Arginine and ADMA will be compared to the time it takes the participants to recover from surgery and any complications that may arise following surgery. During the study the study team will use the participants electronic medical record to establish when the participant became fully established on oral feeding and monitor for any complications that occurred during their recovery.

Primary Posterior Tracheopexy Prevents Tracheal Collapse

Introduction: Children born with a blind-ending gullet (oesophagus), or Oesophageal Atresia (OA), need to undergo surgical correction in the first week of life. OA is often accompanied by a weakened windpipe (trachea), known as tracheomalacia (TM). TM entails that the windpipe collapses during expiration. Severe TM can cause respiratory symptoms, including frequent respiratory tract infections and blue spells, that can potentially lead to life-threatening events. In some patients, major secondary surgical treatment may be indicated. This surgical procedure involves widening the trachea (using sutures) to prevent collapse, known as secondary posterior tracheopexy (SPT). Prior to performing this SPT, complications and negative consequences of TM may have already occurred. This may be prevented by performing this procedure during the primary OA correction, called a primary posterior tracheopexy (PPT). The aim of this trial is to determine if a PPT can decrease - or prevent - tracheal collapse in newborns with OA and TM, compared to a wait-and-see policy (no-PPT). Methods: This is an international multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial. Seventy eight children with OA type C will be included. Patients will be included after written parental informed consent. Half of the patients will be randomly allocated to the PPT-group and half to the no-PPT-group. The degree and location of TM are evaluated through preoperative, intraoperative and two postoperative videoscopic examinations of the trachea (tracheobronchoscopy). Whether TM symptoms occur is assessed during three routine follow-up consultations until the age of 6 months. The primary outcome is the degree of collapse of the tracheal wall during the intraoperative tracheobronchoscopy (after performing the PPT/no-PPT), measured in percentages. Risks and burden: Since OA correction with PPT (more recently implemented in centres of expertise) and without PPT (wait-and-see policy) are both accepted and safe treatment options, participating in the trial does not pose an increased risk or burden with regards to the treatment. Performing tracheobronchoscopies may pose a potential burden. However, a tracheobronchoscopy is a routine diagnostic procedure commonly used to safely assess the trachea. Complications of a tracheobronchoscopy are rare. Also, many of the tracheobronchoscopies are routinely performed as part of standard care for these patients, regardless of the trial.