Clinical Research Directory

Overviewing Real-World Outcomes to Boost Interventional Management of CAlcified Coronary Lesions: the OROBICA Registry.

The OROBICA (Overviewing Real-World Outcomes to Boost Interventional Management of CAlcified Coronary Lesions) Registry is a multicenter, ambispective, real-world observational study designed to evaluate clinical, procedural, imaging, and economic outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified coronary artery disease. Coronary artery calcification represents one of the main determinants of procedural complexity and adverse outcomes in contemporary interventional cardiology. Despite the increasing availability of advanced calcium-modification technologies and intracoronary imaging techniques, evidence regarding the optimal treatment strategy in real-world clinical practice remains limited, particularly among high-risk and complex patients often underrepresented in randomized trials. The OROBICA Registry aims to systematically collect longitudinal data from all-comer patients treated for severely calcified coronary lesions using contemporary PCI strategies, including intracoronary imaging guidance (IVUS/OCT), rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, specialty balloons, and combined calcium-modification approaches. The primary objective is to assess clinical and procedural outcomes, with particular focus on target vessel failure (TVF). Secondary and exploratory objectives include evaluation of procedural success, imaging findings, predictors of adverse outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and economic impact associated with the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. The registry is designed as a flexible research platform intended to support future hypothesis-generating analyses and provide real-world evidence to improve personalized management strategies for calcified coronary artery disease.

Orbital Atherectomy vs Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Nodules (ORBIT-SHOCK).

The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The aim of this pilot trial is to compare PCI outcomes and the incidence of adverse events between both techniques.

Trial to Assess Non-inferiority of an Orbital Atherectomy Only Versus a Calcium-tailored Debulking Approach

Some patients with coronary artery disease have severely calcified vessels. In these cases, placing a stent - a small tube that helps keep the artery open - can be very difficult. Calcium build-up in the artery wall may prevent the stent from expanding properly, increasing the risk of complications or failure of the treatment. To prepare these vessels before stenting, doctors use special techniques to modify or remove the calcium. These techniques are known as plaque modification strategies and can include devices such as atherectomy systems, scoring balloons, or intravascular lithotripsy. However, there is no clear standard as to which strategy is best. Purpose of the Study: This study compares two different approaches to treating calcified coronary arteries before stenting: * A uniform approach using only the orbital atherectomy system (Diamondback 360®, Abbott), which sands away the calcium with a rotating crown * A tailored approach, where the operator chooses from various available methods (e.g., rotational atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloons, or shockwave therapy) based on the patient's specific type of calcium The goal is to determine whether the uniform orbital atherectomy approach is not worse (non-inferior) than the individualized method when it comes to how well the stent expands inside the artery. This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Randomization ensures fair comparison between both groups. The decision to implant a stent and to use additional techniques is at the discretion of the interventional cardiologist.