Clinical Research Directory

10°C vs 4°C Lung Preservation RCT

Despite lung transplantation (LTx) being the most effective treatment for end-stage lung disease, its success rate is lower than that of other solid organ transplantations. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the most common post-operative complication and a major factor in early mortality and morbidity, affecting \~25% of lung transplant patients. Induced by ischemia reperfusion, PGD represents a severe and acute lung injury that occurs within the first 72 hours after transplantation, and has a significant impact on short- and long-term outcomes, and a significant increase in treatment costs. Any intervention that reduces the risk of PGD will lead to major improvements in short- and long-term transplant outcomes and health care systems. One of the main strategies to reduce the risk and severity of post-transplant PGD is to improve pre-transplant donor lung preservation methods. In current practice, lung preservation is typically performed by cold flushing the organ with a specialized preservation solution, followed by subsequent hypothermic storage on ice (\~4°C). This method continues to be used and applied across different organ systems due to its simplicity and low cost. Using this method for the preservation of donor lungs, the current maximum accepted preservation times have been limited to approximately 6-8h. While the goal of hypothermic storage is to sustain cellular viability during ischemic time through reduced cellular metabolism, lower organ temperature has also been shown to progressively favor mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, the ideal temperature for donor organ preservation remains to be defined and should maintain a balance between avoidance of mitochondrial dysfunction and prevention of cellular exhaustion. In addition to that, safe and longer preservation times can lead to multiple advantages such as moving overnight transplants to daytime, more flexibility to transplant logistics, more time for proper donor to recipient matching etc. Building on pre-clinical research suggesting that 10°C may be the optimal lung storage temperature, a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted at University Health Network, Medical University of Vienna and Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital. Donor lungs meeting criteria for direct transplantation and with cross clamp times between 6:00pm - 4:00am were intentionally delayed to an earliest allowed start time of 6:00am and a maximum preservation time from donor cold flush to recipient anesthesia start time of 12 hours. Lungs were retrieved and transported in the usual fashion using a cooler with ice and transferred to a 10°C temperature-controlled cooler upon arrival to transplant hospital until implantation. The primary outcome of this study was incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Grade 3 at 72h, with secondary endpoints including: recipient time on the ventilator, ICU Length of Stay (LOS), hospital LOS, 30-day survival and lung function at 1-year. Outcomes were compared to a contemporaneous conventionally transplanted recipient cohort using propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio. 70 patients were included in the study arm. Post-transplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups for up to 1 year. Thus, intentional prolongation of donor lung preservation at 10°C was shown to be clinically safe and feasible. In the current study design, the investigators will conduct a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial of 300 participants to compare donor lung preservation from the time of explant to implant at \~10°C in X°Port Lung Transport Device (Traferox Technologies Inc.) vs a standard ice cooler. When eligible donor lungs become available for a consented recipient, the lungs will be randomized to undergo a preservation protocol using either 10°C (X°Port Lung Transport Device, Traferox Technologies Inc.) or standard of care. The primary outcome of the study is incidence of ISHLT Primary Graft Dysfunction Grade 3 at 72 hours. Post-transplant outcomes will be followed for one year.

Multimodal Neuromonitoring During Normothermic Regional Perfusion for Organ Donors Determined Dead by circuLatory Criteria Following Withdrawal of Life Sustaining Measures

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that cerebral blood flow and brain function do not resume after death declaration in organ donors who undergo normothermic regional perfusion to restore organ function following death determination by circulatory criteria, when appropriate safeguards are applied. To assess the absence of cerebral perfusion and function, investigators will use continuous and comprehensive multimodal neuromonitoring throughout the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, the dying process and the NRP procedure.

Predictive Accuracy of Machine Perfusion for Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Germany

Kidney transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for end-stage renal disease, yet the increasing use of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys heightens the risk of ischemia-reperfusion injury, particularly under static cold storage (SCS). Continuous hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has been introduced to improve preservation quality, but robust clinical evidence regarding its predictive value for post-transplant outcomes in ECD kidneys after donation after brain death (DBD) is limited. The PRE-MAP Kidney Study is a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter observational study conducted across all German transplant centers. The study systematically collects technical machine perfusion parameters (flow, resistance, perfusion duration) and correlates these with clinical outcomes following kidney transplantation. The primary endpoint is 12-month kidney function (eGFR). Secondary endpoints include surgical complications, length of stay, and transplant-specific events (acute rejection, primary non-function, delayed graft function). This national cohort aims to determine the prognostic significance of HMP parameters in marginal donor kidneys and to generate evidence supporting future recommendations for organ preservation and allocation practices.

ZeroHeart Biopsy - Prediction of Deceased Donor Heart Transplant Performance From Organ Donors Using Pre-Transplant Biopsies - A Pilot Study

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether molecular analysis of donor heart biopsies taken at the time of organ removal ("Time Zero") can help predict the future function and rejection risk of the transplanted heart in adult transplant recipients. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can early molecular injury in the donor heart, caused by brain death or circulatory death, be detected at the time of organ removal? * Can these early molecular findings predict short-, mid-, and long-term transplant outcomes, such as graft function or rejection? Participants will: * Include heart donors whose hearts are being transplanted (both standard and marginal donors, including DBD and DCD cases) * Provide two small biopsies from the donor heart at the time of organ removal: one for routine pathology, one for microarray-based molecular analysis * Have routine follow-up biopsies after transplantation as part of standard care (no additional procedures required beyond medical standard) Researchers will compare biopsy results from different donor types (standard vs. marginal, DBD vs. DCD) to see if early molecular signals are linked to later heart transplant outcomes.

A Central Preservation and Assessment Service to Optimize Donor Kidney Allocation

This is a study to collect information to assess if transporting hard-to-place (HTP) donor kidneys to a central preservation and assessment facility with dedicated organ assessment capabilities increases allocation success to transplant hospitals.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy and Organ Preservation Versus Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

This study hypothesizes that approximately 50% of rectal cancer patients can preserve their rectum using a watch-and-wait strategy if they achieve a complete or near-complete clinical response to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). The objective is to determine whether the complications, quality of life, and survival rates of rectal cancer patients who have achieved a complete or near-complete clinical response to TNT, followed by a watch-and-wait approach, are comparable to those of patients who undergo surgery first. Additionally, the study aims to identify potential prognostic and predictive markers for rectal cancer and examine survival rates and factors influencing responses to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or TNT. The study is divided into two parts: \*\*Part One:\*\* Participants with cT1N1, T2-T3 N0-1 rectal cancer, MRF-, and EMVI-, with surgery as one of the possible first-line treatment options, will be randomized into two groups. The experimental group will consist of participants receiving TNT, including CRT and consolidation chemotherapy (Ch). If these participants achieve a complete or near-complete clinical response, they will be observed using a watch-and-wait strategy, which is a non-operative approach. The control group will consist of participants who undergo surgical treatment initially. \*\*Part Two:\*\* All participants with rectal cancer who have received CRT or TNT will be included. Additionally, participants diagnosed with rectal cancer who are scheduled for CRT or TNT but declined to participate in Part One or do not meet the inclusion criteria will also be included.

Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: Contact X-ray Brachytherapy vs Extending the Waiting Interval and Local Excision

The goal of this prospective phase II feasibility study is to evaluate two additional local treatment options in rectal cancer patients with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation: contact x-ray brachytherapy versus extension of the waiting interval with or without local excision, and to investigate which rate of organ preservation can be achieved.