Clinical Research Directory

Phase III Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of SL1002 for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Dose Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of SL1002 for the Treatment of Knee Pain in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

Revised Targets for Knee Radiofrequency Ablation

This research team is doing a study to learn more about a new way to treat long-term knee pain caused by joint damage. They are using a treatment called radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This is a procedure where doctors use heat to stop certain nerves from sending pain signals. In this study, doctors will use ultrasound to guide a small needle to nerves around the knee, called genicular nerves. Then, they will apply heat to those nerves using radiofrequency energy to help reduce pain. The team created this new method based on recent studies of knee anatomy. They want to find out if this method can safely reduce pain and help people with knee joint damage move better. The study includes people who have moderate to severe knee damage and still have pain after trying medicine, physical therapy, or joint injections. Each person in the study will have the treatment once. The research team will follow each person for two years. During this time, people in the study will answer simple questions about their knee pain and how it affects their daily life. The researchers will collect this information before the treatment and several times after it. One week after the procedure, the team will call each person to ask how they are feeling and check for any side effects. Possible benefits of the study include less knee pain and easier movement. Possible risks include pain during the procedure, bruising, swelling, or short-term worsening of pain. Rare risks include nerve problems, weakness, bone damage, or allergic reaction. The study is free for participants, and there is no payment. Taking part is voluntary. Anyone can stop being in the study at any time without affecting their medical care. The research team will keep all personal information private and secure.

Antarctic Krill Oil for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Antarctic Krill Oil (AKO) as a dietary supplement in managing pain associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The main questions it aims to answer are: ①Does AKO reduce daily pain intensity in participants with moderate knee OA? ②What adverse effects do participants experience when taking AKO? Researchers will conduct a randomized, double-blind study comparing AKO to a placebo (identical appearance without active components) to assess: * Changes in joint pain severity; ②Functional improvement in daily activities; ③Biochemical safety parameters,etc.

Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial Between Robotic and Caliper-based Techniques

Knee replacement surgery is a surgery designed to treat severe arthritis of the knee. However, as many as 20% of patients are not satisfied with the results of their surgery. To place the knee replacement in correct position, the kinematic alignment method, which tries to reproduce the patient normal anatomy, has shown promise in improving the satisfaction after knee replacement surgery. It is not known if using a robotic arm to assist in surgery is better than the traditional method when trying to recreate kinematic alignment. The goal of this study is to learn if robotic assisted surgery is better than traditional method for knee replacement done using kinematic alignment. The main questions the study tries to answer are: 1. Do the radiographs of kinematic knee replacement surgeries done with robotic assistance show better alignment than radiographs of kinematic knee replacements done with the traditional method? 2. Does robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement give better function to patients than traditional knee replacement done with kinematic alignment? 3. Does robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement decrease pain, improve knee movement and improve knee stability better than traditional knee replacement done with kinematic alignment? 4. Are there more complications with robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement in comparison to traditional kinematic knee replacement? 5. How long long does it take a surgeon to become good a performing a kinematic knee replacement using robotic assistance? Researchers will compare knee replacements done using a robotic to make the bone cuts, and compare it to the usual method using guides and manual instruments. All the knee replacements will be done using the kinematic alignment and with the same type of knee replacement prothesis. Participants will: * Have a knee replacement done with the kinematic alignment technique by an experienced surgeon, with or without robotic assistance during the surgery. * Visit the clinic before surgery, six weeks after surgery, three months, six months, twelve months and twenty-four months after the surgery. * Fill questionnaire, have their knee examined and have radiographs of their knee done at each visit.