Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 PREMs clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07289152
Pediatric Anesthesia: The Childs Voice
In Denmark, around 25,000 children under 18 undergo general anesthesia annually. Hospital stays and anesthesia can induce significant anxiety and stress in children due to unfamiliar environments, procedures, and communication issues. This anxiety can be linked to postoperative complications such as emergence delirium and may negatively impact both the child and their family's well-being. Engaging patients actively in their healthcare, including pediatric cases, is essential for improving outcomes. Assessing perioperative patient and family outcomes, particularly through patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM), can significantly enhance the quality of care provided to children. While PROMs are widely used in adults, they are less common in pediatric settings. The Pediatric Scale for Quality of Recovery (PedSQoR), developed by Australian and American researchers, is one such tool designed to measure recovery in children. This study aims to translate andvalidate the PedSQoR for Danish children aged 4-12. Furthermore, no existing instruments comprehensively assess pediatric surgery patients' experiences under general anesthesia, particularly from the child's perspective without relying on parents as proxies. Empowering children to express their healthcare experiences gives healthcare workers an insight into what matters for children and gives children a more positive outlook on healthcare, benefiting lifelong engagement. Study Aims and Objectives: The study aims to enhance the assessment of children's outcomes and experiences in perioperative settings, ultimately improving pediatric perioperative healthcare. The objectives include: 1. Translation and Adaptation: a. Translate and adapt the PedSQoR for Danish children aged 4-12. b. Validate the Danish PedSQoR version. 2. Development of a PREM Instrument: a. Develop a comprehensive PREM for children's experiences during surgery and anesthesia. b. Pilot-test and adjust the PREM questionnaire with a group of children aged 4-12. Study Methods: 1. PedSQoR Translation and Validation: A single-center prospective cohort study will adapt and test the PedSQoR for Danish children. The process involves translating the 21-item scale, validating it with a sample size of 150, and ensuring reliability through various statistical methods, including Cronbach's Alpha and test-retest reliability. Data will be collected from the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care at Gødstrup Hospital. 2. PREM Instrument Development: This study will develop a PREM instrument using the Warwick Patient Experiences Framework (WaPEF), which encompasses seven dimensions of patient experience. The process will involve forming a panel of child experts, conducting focus groups, and translating insights into a pictorial questionnaire. The PREM will undergo pilot testing with 20 children to validate its effectiveness in capturing the dimensions of the WaPEF. Research Ethics: Given the vulnerability of children in research, this study will prioritize their safety and comfort, ensuring the study's benefits outweigh any potential risks. Informed consent will be obtained from both parents and children. The study will be registered with the Region Central Denmark's list of research projects and will not require approval from the Scientific Ethics Committee.
Gender: All
Ages: 4 Years - 12 Years
Updated: 2026-02-17
3 states
NCT06272552
Implementing PROMs and PREMs in Routine Clinical Care: Assessment of Requirements and Impact
There has been increasing interest in the use of patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in clinical practice; yet few empirical studies have been conducted to evaluate the usefulness of such implementation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care for improving health outcomes and satisfaction with health management. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: In and outpatient departments of a public hospital in Spain. Participants: 1,440 adult patients managed for breast cancer, prostate cancer, chronic kidney disease, or bariatric surgery. Intervention: Patients will monthly complete, through an App from their smartphones, PROMs and PREMs (arm A, n=480), or only PREMs (arm B, n=480). Responses to PROMs will be transformed into a graphic summary, accessible for physicians and patients at the follow-up visits of the project (9 and 18 months after recruitment). Main outcome measures: Comparison of change among arms on the assessment variables - such as health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), satisfaction with care, or patient-professionals communication. These constructs will be measured at recruitment and at follow up visits for all patients, regardless of their arm allocation (arm C would only be administered these questionnaires, without intervention, n=480). Expected results: Incorporating PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care may improve patients\' and health professionals\' experiences on health care, as well as improve patients\' health.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2024-02-22
1 state