Clinical Research Directory

BaLloon-based PFA Ablation poST Approval Outcomes for PAF and PersAF

This study is designed to obtain real-world clinical evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the Volt PFA System in various use cases, with a sub study designed to address additional clinical evidence needs in electrophysiology.

Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)

The study is a prospective, single-arm, pre-market clinical study and will enroll up to 300 subjects at up to 26 sites in the United States (US) for analysis of primary objectives. No single site may contribute more than 15% of the enrollments.

Coherent Sine Burst Electroporation (CSE) Ablation System US IDE Study for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Argá Medtech CSE Ablation System in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Feasibility Study of the FARAFLEX Mapping and PFA System

The objective of this feasibility study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the FARAFLEX mapping and pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter, a novel catheter in treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) or symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF).

The Effect of Pulse Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Involving Posterior Wall Ablation on Atrial Mechancis Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Assessing the impact of a new atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation energy on left atrial structure and function is of crucial importance. The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation on left atrial structure.

FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation System

To obtain real world data on the use of, and provide continued evidence on safety and effectiveness of the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) system when used per hospitals' standard of care in Chinese population.

Comparative Efficacy of 100-, 200-, & 400-mg Amiodarone in Patients With Paroxysmal AF Depending on Plasma Concentration

Amiodarone is a highly effective drug for the treatment and prevention of arrhythmias. In the 1970s and 1980s, numerous experimental and clinical studies comprehensively examined the mechanisms of amiodarone's antiarrhythmic action, as well as its effectiveness in various types of arrhythmias. This explains why drug therapy is so widespread today. According to the CAMIAT study, which included 1,202 patients with ventricular extrasystole who had suffered a myocardial infarction, amiodarone administration reduced the risk of arrhythmic death by 48.5%, and by 35% in the EMIAT study. In the GESICA study, amiodarone therapy was documented to reduce overall mortality by 45%, the incidence of sudden cardiac death by 54%, and mortality from progressive heart failure by 40%. In Russia, amiodarone is prescribed as a first-line drug for AF in 41% of cases with organic myocardial disease, in 52% as a second-line drug, and in 12.5% in the absence of organic heart damage. Moreover, the effectiveness of maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation varies from 30 to 95.2%, which is a significant range when predicting the effectiveness of treatment. Attempts to assess amiodarone concentrations during therapy and to analyze the correlation with the achieved effects have been made repeatedly. While assessing amiodarone concentrations is generally considered inappropriate, based on the results of numerous studies, the use of monitoring is justified in certain clinical situations where the desired clinical effect or adverse events are absent. A detailed analysis of systemic reviews revealed significant shortcomings in the formation of such judgments. The groups were heterogeneous, small in number, and included, among other things, individual clinical situations and different routes of drug administration. A literature review did not reveal any data on the analysis of the concentration of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone as an anti-relapse therapy for atrial fibrillation when used consistently in doses acceptable by clinical guidelines with the possibility of titration under laboratory monitoring.

A Study of the TactiFlex SE Catheter and Volt PFA Generator in Subjects With PAF:

The objective of this clinical study is to demonstrate that ablation with the TactiFlex SE Ablation catheter, in conjunction with a compatible pulsed field ablation (PFA) and/or radio frequency (RF) generator, is safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic, recurrent, drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Variable-Loop Biphasic Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

The VARIFY study is designed to find out how durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is after treatment with the VARIPULSE pulsed field ablation (PFA) system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is a common heart rhythm disorder caused by abnormal electrical signals coming from the pulmonary veins. In a PVI procedure, these veins are electrically isolated to prevent AF from recurring. Sometimes, the veins reconnect over time, which can lead to a return of arrhythmia. PFA is a new, non-thermal technology that uses short electrical pulses to safely and precisely treat heart tissue, reducing the risk of damage to nearby structures. The VARIPULSE system is one of these new PFA platforms. In this study, 20 adult patients with paroxysmal AF will undergo PVI using the VARIPULSE system. After 2-3 months, each patient will have a second planned procedure to check whether the pulmonary veins remain isolated. Any reconnections found will be treated immediately. The main goal is to determine how often the pulmonary veins stay durably isolated after the initial VARIPULSE treatment. Secondary goals include assessing the amount of scar tissue in the left atrium, recording any complications, and evaluating rhythm outcomes after one year. The results will help determine how effective and reliable the VARIPULSE system is for long-term treatment of AF.

SVC-isolation in Redo-AF Ablation With Isolated PV

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in the population and is often caused by arrhythmogenic foci located in the pulmonary veins. For this reason, the first attempt in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation procedures is to isolate these structures (the procedure is called indeed "pulmonary vein isolation"), which results in abolishment of arrhythmia recurrence in up to 85% of patients at short and mid-term follow-up. However, a subset of patients experience an atrial tachyarrhytmia recurrence and a second catheter ablation procedure has to be performed. If pulmary vein isolation is proven to be durable, other arrhythmogenic foci could be implicated in arrhythmia recurrence. Among extra-pulmonary vein foci, superior vena cava has been described as the most frequently involved in atrial fibrillation initiation. Therefore, its ablation could result in improved freedom from atrial fibrillation episodes during follow-up. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of empirical superior vena cava isolation in terms of arrhythmia-free survival in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence despite durable pulmonary vein isolation.

Evaluation of the Impact of Pulsed Field Ablation on Autonomic Nervous System Modulation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of pulse field (PF) energy, both alone and in combination with radiofrequency (RF) energy, on vagal modulation during point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The effect of PF energy on ganglionated plexi (GP) will be assessed using heart rate variability (HRV) as a surrogate marker. Participants will be randomized into three groups: the PF-only group and the Hybrid group (PF posterior/RF anterior) as the experimental arms, and the RF-only group as the control arm. HRV will be measured before and 24 hours after the PVI procedure. Additionally, cardio and neuro biomarkers (Troponin and S100B) will be measured pre-procedure and 20 minutes post-ablation. All participants will be followed for 12 months, with 24-hour Holter-ECG evaluations scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial ablation procedure.