Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

4 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Periapical Healing

Tundra lists 4 Periapical Healing clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT07762599

Silver Nanoparticle-Reinforced Double Antibiotic Paste in Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Apical periodontitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition of the periapical tissues. The Symptomatic Apical periodontitis (SAP) represents the active phase of the disease, presenting with pain and tenderness. In SAP, levels of inflammatory mediators such as Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) are elevated in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Assessing these biomarkers in GCF provides a novel, non-invasive method to evaluate periapical inflammation and healing. Due to the polymicrobial nature of root canal infections, the use of Intracanal medicaments (ICM) has been recommended to achieve effective disinfection. Traditionally used ICMs have their own inherent limitations. Hence, ICMs such as Triple antibiotic paste (TAP), double antibiotic paste (DAP), Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and their various combinations are gaining popularity. Currently, various combinations of AgNPs with other agents such as chitosan, calcium hydroxide, antibiotics and various herbal products are being tried to improve its effectiveness when used as an ICM. However, to the best of investigators knowledge, no study reinforced the DAP with AgNPs. Hence, the current double-blind, randomized, parallel clinical trial is planned to compare the effects of DAP with and without reinforcement of AgNPs on inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1β and MMP-9), postendodontic pain, and periapical healing in SAP. Moreover, this DAP+AgNPs formulation will undergo characterization such as FTIR, TEM/SEM, Zeta potential to assess its properties. Methods A total of 50 adult participants with SAP in single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into two groups based on the type of ICM used: Group I received DAP, while Group II received DAP reinforced with AgNPs. Before starting the root canal treatment, GCF will be collected and marked as baseline. Then under rubber dam isolation all teeth underwent root canal treatment and ICM will be placed according to the specific group. Patient will be recalled after 14 days and again GCF sample will be collected after removal of the ICM. The samples will be stored at -800C for analysis. All samples will undergo enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to estimate IL1β and MMP-9 levels. Pain levels will be recorded using the Numerical Rating scale (NRS) at various intervals. Data will be analyzed using STATA, SPSS or R. P value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Discussion Most conventional ICM have limited ability to penetrate where residual microorganisms often persist. Nanoparticle-based formulations such as AgNPs have gained attention because of their extremely small size, surface charge, and potent antimicrobial activity, which enable them to penetrate dentinal tubules and disrupt bacterial biofilms that are resistant to conventional antibiotics. Incorporating AgNPs into DAP could therefore enhance their antibacterial efficacy. Furthermore, since most endodontic pathogens cannot be routinely cultivated, monitoring the changes in inflammatory biomarkers in GCF provides a reliable and non-invasive method to assess the biological response and healing. Hence, the current double-blind, randomized, parallel clinical trial is planned to compare the effects of DAP with and without reinforcement of AgNPs on inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1β and MMP-9), postendodontic pain, and periapical healing in SAP. The findings may support the use of nanoparticle-assisted ICM as a safer and more effective approach for endodontic disinfection and healing

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 60 Years

Updated: 2026-08-13

1 state

Apical Periodontitis
Post Endodontic Pain
Periapical Healing
+1
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

NCT07583004

Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Sizes and Remaining Tooth Structure on the Survival of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molars

Teeth that have undergone endodontic treatment are biomechanically weakened compared to vital teeth due to factors such as extensive carious lesions, previous restorations, loss of marginal ridges and pericervical dentin, and hard tissue removal during access cavity preparation and root canal instrumentation. Additionally, the quantity and quality of the remaining coronal tooth structure, the presence of marginal ridges, the ferrule effect, and the integrity of pericervical dentin directly influence both fracture resistance and the long-term success of restorations. Following endodontic access cavity preparation, the fracture resistance of the tooth decreases by approximately 5%. This reduction increases to around 20-30% in the case of unilateral marginal ridge loss (mesio-occlusal \[MO\] or disto-occlusal \[DO\] cavities), and can reach up to 63% when both marginal ridges are lost (mesio-occluso-distal \[MOD\] cavities). This condition may lead to cusp deflection under occlusal forces and, particularly in the absence of appropriate post-endodontic restoration, may result in failures such as vertical root fractures. It has been reported that, after caries removal and access cavity preparation, the amount of remaining sound coronal tooth structure may play an important role in determining the extent of mechanical preparation during treatment. The goal of mechanical preparation of the root canal system is to remove infected dentin and biofilm as much as possible and to create a continuously tapered canal shape that allows effective delivery of irrigants to the apical region. Although conventional preparation principles may provide higher levels of disinfection, they have been associated with reduced tooth strength, particularly due to the loss of resistance in the pericervical area. This has led to the development of more conservative root canal preparation strategies using instruments with smaller apical sizes and tapers. Previous studies investigating the relationship between preparation size and fracture resistance have shown considerable heterogeneity. Moreover, the predominantly in vitro nature of these studies limits their ability to accurately simulate clinical conditions. In addition, factors such as the amount of remaining tooth structure after treatment and the effectiveness of the final restoration are often overlooked. Therefore, it is important to support in vitro findings with clinical studies. To date, there is no long-term clinical study in the literature evaluating the combined effects of conventional and conservative preparation strategies on clinical survival and periodontal health in teeth with varying degrees of coronal tissue loss. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiographically evaluate the survival of mandibular molars with different amounts of remaining tooth structure (O, MO/DO, and MOD) following conventional and conservative root canal preparation. The null hypothesis is that different preparation strategies and the amount of remaining tooth structure have a similar effect on tooth survival.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 60 Years

Updated: 2026-05-13

Periapical Healing
Restoration Survival
NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT07529964

MMP-2/3 and Periapical Healing Outcomes

This prospective randomized clinical study will investigate the association between MMP-2 and MMP-3 gene polymorphisms and radiographic healing outcomes following nonsurgical root canal treatment in patients with chronic apical periodontitis. A total of 50 patients will undergo standardized endodontic treatment and will be followed for 12 months. Genotyping will be performed using baseline DNA samples, and periapical healing will be assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI). The relationship between genetic variations and treatment outcomes will be analyzed to determine whether host-related genetic factors influence healing patterns after root canal therapy.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 65 Years

Updated: 2026-04-14

Chronic Apical Periodontitis
Periapical Healing
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

NCT07500870

Comparative Evaluation of Endodontic Instrumentation Kinematics and Cryotherapy on Post-endodontic Pain and Periapical Healing

TITLE : Comparative evaluation of two different endodontic instrumentation kinematics and cryotherapy on post endodontic pain and periapical healing in teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis - A double blind, prospective randomized clinical trial Background : Root canal treatment is done to save teeth that are infected or damaged. Although this procedure relieves pain in the long term, many patients experience discomfort or pain after treatment, known as post-endodontic pain (PEP). The way dentists clean the root canals and the methods used to reduce inflammation may influence how much pain patients feel and how well the bone around the tooth heals. This study will compare two modern ways of cleaning root canals using special nickel-titanium files. The first method uses a rotary system, where the files continuously rotate inside the canal. The second method uses a reciprocating system, where the files move back and forth. Both systems are commonly used in dentistry, but it is still not clear which one leads to less pain and better healing. The study will also test the benefit of cryotherapy, which means rinsing the canal with very cold saline at the end of the cleaning. Cold therapy reduces blood flow and nerve activity, helping to control pain and swelling without the side effects of medicines. Methodology: Sixty patients with asymptomatic apical will be included. They will be randomly assigned into four groups: Group1:Rotary system with cryotherapy, Group 2:Rotary system without cryotherapy, Group 3: Reciprocating system with cryotherapy, Group 4 : Reciprocating system without cryotherapy.Patients will record their pain on a simple scale at different times after treatment. Healing of the infection will be checked with X-rays after six months. OBJECTIVES: Primary Objective: To compare the post endodontic pain following instrumentation with a rotary vs reciprocating kinematic instrumentation system at different irrigant temperature using NRS-11 scale. Secondary Objective: To assess the periapical healing following endodontic treatment with or without adjunctive use of cryotherapy assessed with periapical healing index . The results of this study will help dentists understand whether cryotherapy and the choice of instrumentation system can reduce patient discomfort and improve treatment success. This may lead to better patient care and less need for pain medications after root canal treatment.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - Any

Updated: 2026-03-30

1 state

Post Endodontic Pain
Periapical Healing