Clinical Research Directory

Spontaneous Dislocation and Adverse Events of a Prophylactic Pancreatic Stent

A multicenter, prospective, controlled randomized study to investigate the optimal duration of protective pancreatic stents after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The primary endpoint is the complication rate that can be clinically attributed to the remaining pancreatic prosthesis or its removal in the study groups. Secondary endpoints are spontaneous removal of the pancreatic stent, length of hospital stay, rate of follow-up examinations per group, influencing factors, and a possible exploratory analysis.

Dose-escalation of Rectal Indomethacin for Preventing PEP

Our aim is to compare the efficacy of 100 mg versus 200 mg rectal indometacin in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) among high-risk patients without no pancreatic stenting. The 100 mg versus 200 mg indometacin trial is a multicentre, single-blind, randomized controlled study. High-risk patients for PEP without pancreatic stent insertion will be informed about the opportunity to participate. A total of 1,036 eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: (1) administration of 100 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (standard-dose group), or (2) administration of 200 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (high-dose group). The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of PEP. Secondary outcomes include hyperamylasemia and other ERCP-related adverse events (AEs).

Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Indomethacin for Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used procedure for diagnosing and treating pancreatic and biliary diseases. Despite its benefits, ERCP carries a risk of post-procedure pancreatitis (PEP), which occurs in approximately 12.2% of cases and can significantly increase healthcare costs and patient morbidity. Preventing PEP is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing the economic burden of ERCP. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as indomethacin, have been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of PEP when administered rectally before ERCP. The standard dose recommended by guidelines is 100mg, which has been associated with a significant reduction in PEP rates. However, higher doses of NSAIDs can increase the risk of adverse events, including gastrointestinal bleeding and renal impairment. Therefore, there is a need to determine whether a lower dose can provide similar benefits without increasing these risks. This multicenter, non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled trial will be conducted in China. Participants will be adults aged 18 or older scheduled for ERCP. They will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the low-dose (50mg) or standard-dose (100mg) indomethacin group. The intervention will be administered rectally 30 minutes before the ERCP procedure. The study will follow a double-blind design, ensuring that both patients and investigators are unaware of the treatment allocation. The results of this trial could significantly influence clinical practice by providing evidence on the effectiveness of a lower dose of indomethacin in preventing PEP. This could lead to a reduction in the risk of adverse events associated with higher doses and potentially decrease healthcare costs without compromising patient safety. By optimizing the dosing of indomethacin, this study aims to improve the safety and cost-effectiveness of ERCP procedures.

Early Pancreatic Stent Placement for Preventing PEP

Our aim is to compare early versus late pancreatic stent placement in preventing PEP among patients with naive papilla. The EVL trial will provide essential answers regarding the optimal timing of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in PEP prevention.All patients with difficult biliary cannulation undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique for biliary access will be told about the opportunity to participate in EVL research. In total, 768 patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to two arms: (1) early pancreatic stent placement (EPSP) (a pancreatic stent will be placed immediately after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST)) and (2) late pancreatic stent placement (LPSP) (a pancreatic stent will be placed after all completion of therapeutic biliary procedures, e.g. biliary stone removal or drainage).The primary outcome is the rate and severity of PEP. The secondary outcomes are hyperamylasemia, the rate of stenting success, and other ERCP-related adverse events (AEs).