Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 Procedural Pain Relief clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07292337
AcuTENS for Pain Relief During TRUS-Guided Prostate Biopsy
This study evaluates whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied at specific acupuncture points (AcuTENS) can reduce pain and anxiety during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for participants suspected of prostate cancer. Many patients experience significant discomfort despite the use of periprostatic nerve block (PPNB). The aim of this study is to determine whether AcuTENS provides additional pain relief or anxiety reduction beyond standard analgesia. The findings may help identify a simple, low-risk adjunct that can improve patient comfort during prostate biopsy. AcuTENS is a non-invasive technique that delivers mild electrical stimulation through the skin, targeting acupuncture points believed to modulate pain perception. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants are assigned to receive either active AcuTENS or a placebo TENS device that produces no therapeutic stimulation . All participants with receive routine care, including PPNB, according to institutional protocol. Pain scores, anxiety levels, vital signs, and patient satisfaction are recorded before, during, and after the biopsy.
Gender: MALE
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-12-24
1 state
NCT07178379
Hysteroscopy Anesthesia for Relief of Pain
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of local anesthesia on pain perception in patients undergoing outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy. Although generally well tolerated, pain during hysteroscopy remains a leading cause of procedural failure and patient discomfort. Current evidence on the effectiveness of local anesthetic techniques is limited, with considerable variability in study designs, patient populations, and outcomes measured. This study will compare pain levels between two groups: one receiving local anesthetic infiltration (3% mepivacaine into the uterosacral ligaments), and the other undergoing a placebo-like intervention (saline irrigation without injection). Pain will be assessed using a standardized Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The primary objective is to determine whether local anesthesia significantly reduces pain perception during the procedure. Secondary objectives include evaluating which patient or procedural variables may influence pain (e.g., parity, uterine position, BMI, operator experience) and whether local anesthesia impacts the need for post-procedural analgesia or complication rates. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a simple randomization method. Although the study design does not allow for double blinding, efforts will be made to minimize expectation bias-patients will not be explicitly informed whether they are receiving anesthesia or not, and the placebo group will receive simulated intervention. The principal investigator and the statistician will be blinded to the treatment allocation during data analysis. Inclusion criteria are: age ≥ 18 years, indication for office-based diagnostic hysteroscopy or minor operative procedures (e.g., polypectomy or biopsy), and no previous hysteroscopy experience. Exclusion criteria include known anesthetic allergy, complex procedures (e.g., myomectomy), anatomic uterine malformations, severe complications, or lack of consent. A total sample size of 58 patients (29 per group) has been calculated based on an expected clinically relevant VAS difference of 1.5 points and a standard deviation of 2.0. To account for possible dropouts, up to 70 patients may be enrolled. The results of this trial will provide higher quality evidence on whether local anesthesia should be routinely recommended in outpatient hysteroscopy and may support cost-effectiveness studies in the future.
Gender: FEMALE
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-09-17