Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Complete-Arch Prostheses Using Digital Workflows
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare three digital workflows for the fabrication of definitive implant-supported full-arch prostheses in adult patients requiring fixed implant rehabilitation.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does an automated AI-assisted digital workflow improve the passive fit of definitive full-arch implant-supported prostheses compared with manual and splint-guided alignment workflows?
* Are there differences in marginal, geometric, mechanical, and radiographic passivity among the three digital workflows? Researchers will compare manual CBCT-STL alignment, splint-guided alignment, and automated AI-assisted CBCT-STL alignment to see if the degree of digital workflow automation affects the passive fit of definitive full-arch implant-supported prostheses.
Participants will:
* Be adults (18 years and older) indicated for fixed implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.
* Receive a definitive, screw-retained, full-arch implant-supported prosthesis fabricated using one of the three assigned digital workflows.
* Undergo standardized clinical and radiographic assessments at the time of definitive prosthesis placement to evaluate prosthesis passive fit.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Prosthesis and Implant Dentistry