Clinical Research Directory

Clinical Performance of a Novel Self-cured Resin Composite Compared to a Light-cured Bioactive Resin Composite Restoration in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth

The development of dental caries is multi-factorial mainly due to the presence of 4 elements which are: dental biofilm, fermentable carbohydrates , dental hard tissue and time. Other additional social and environmental factors can have a substantial impact on the onset and course of the disease. Dietary habits, oral hygiene, salivary flow and fluoride exposure are key factors that influence the susceptibility to dental caries. If dental caries is properly managed, it is a preventable and reversible disease. The proximal teeth surfaces are the most susceptible sites for demineralization from the acidic byproducts. In modern restorative dentistry, clinicians always seek solutions that streamline procedures, improve outcomes and reduce chair time for patients. Traditional light-cured composite systems often involve a complex seven step process which includes etching, priming, bonding and curing which consumes from 90 to 120 seconds to be completed. With each additional step, the risk of technique errors increases, potentially compromising the longevity of the restoration. Self-cure composites, with their simplified application process, are emerging as a preferred choice over the traditional seven-step composite materials. Recently, a novel self-cured high-performance bulk-fill restorative material has been introduced into the market (Stela, SDI, Victoria, Australia). It's particularly known for its "unlimited" depth of cure and self-adhesive properties.

Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars

Most published research on 3D-printed restorative materials is laboratory-based, focusing primarily on mechanical performance and material properties under controlled conditions. While such studies provide important foundational data, they do not fully replicate the complexity of the oral environment. Only a limited number of clinical investigations have directly compared 3D-printed restorations with conventional direct composite restorations in Class II cavities Furthermore, the integration of a digital workflow introduces additional costs and time requirements related to equipment, software, and training. These factors must be justified by demonstrable improvements in clinical outcomes or cost-effectiveness. By evaluating both clinical performance and economic impact, this trial aims to generate practical, real-world evidence that can guide clinicians in selecting appropriate restorative materials and techniques for routine dental practice.

Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite

the aim of this study is To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Self- Cure Bulk fill Composite Resin Versus Conventional Bulk fill resin composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions over a Period of 24 months Follow-up.