Clinical Research Directory

Research on the Application of Decision Tree in Child Life

The purpose of this study is to understand whether the decision tree for Child Life is effective in improving the professional level and working effect of Child Life Specialists. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the decision tree for Child Life enhance the professional knowledge level of Child Life Specialists? 2. Has the decision tree for Child Life improved the work effectiveness of Child Life Specialists? 3. Has the application of Child Life decision trees improved children's pain levels and compliance? Researchers will compare the intervention group and the observation group to see if the decision tree for Child Life can enhance the professional level and work effectiveness of Child Life Specialists. Participants in the intervention group will: 1. Receive training on the application of decision trees for Child Life. 2. Apply the decision tree for Child Life to carry out intervention in Child Life intervention. 3. Participate in knowledge level tests, work effect evaluations, and record the pain levels and compliance of pediatric patients. Participants in active comparator will: 1. Conduct Child Life intervention based on one's own experience and professional level. 2. Participate in knowledge level tests, work effect evaluations, and record the pain levels and compliance of pediatric patients.

Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Care Intervention in Intensive Care

This Pilot-RCT is part of a feasibility study that aims to learn if the IPS-psychosocial care intervention and an RCT on its efficacy are feasible in patients, relatives and staff on icu wards. The Pilot-RCT will examine outcomes, that might indicate an improvement in psychosocial safety climate and other health- and wellbeing-related measures due to the administration of the intervention that is described in the following. The main question the Pilot-RCT aims to answer is: Is there evidence that the IPS intervention improves the psychosocial safety climate and other components of psychosocial well-being in ICU teams, patients and their relatives? Researchers will compare four intervention groups (icu wards with implementation of the IPS-Intervention) with four control groups (icu wards with regular supply of psychosocial care) to see if the comparison of two groups in this RCT is feasible. The IPS-Intervention consists of a ward psychologist who works as part of the ICU team and takes care of the staff, patients and relatives in accordance to the intervention manual that was developed in a prior phase of this project.