Clinical Research Directory

Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (EMPOWER-HFpEF)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common condition among older adults. It is associated with frequent hospitalizations, impaired functional capacity, reduced quality of life, and high healthcare utilization. Despite recent advances in pharmacological therapy, many patients continue to experience recurrent clinical deterioration and functional decline. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation has demonstrated benefits in improving physical performance and quality of life. Still, its effect on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk HFpEF has not been established. The EMPOWER-HFpEF study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate whether an early, individualized, multimodal exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program improves clinical outcomes compared with usual care in patients with HFpEF. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either usual care alone or usual care plus a structured 12-month exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program. The intervention includes an initial 6-month supervised phase, followed by a 6-month hybrid phase combining supervised sessions with structured home- or community-based exercise to promote long-term adherence and maintenance of physical activity. The primary objective is to determine whether this rehabilitation strategy reduces adverse clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause hospitalizations, and outpatient heart failure decompensation, while improving functional capacity and health-related quality of life over 12 months. The results of this study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a long-term multimodal exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program as part of the comprehensive management of patients with HFpEF.

Modified Essential Frailty Toolset in Older Adults Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome associated with reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to surgical stress. As the population ages, more older adults undergo major elective surgery, yet frailty is often insufficiently assessed in routine practice and no universally accepted screening tool exists. The Essential Frailty Toolset (EFT) is a simple validated frailty assessments and has demonstrated strong predictive value for mortality and major postoperative complications, particularly in cardiac surgery populations. EFT incorporates four key domains of cognition, anemia, serum albumin, and physical function capturing both physical and cognitive vulnerability. A modified version (mEFT) has been developed to improve feasibility and applicability in broader surgical settings, requiring minimal training and only a few minutes to administer. Despite its promise, mEFT has not been evaluated in elderly patients undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery, representing an important gap in the current literature and motivating the present study. We therefore propose a modified and simplified frailty screening tool tailored for elderly patients undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at our institution. The modified Essential Frailty Toolset (mEFT) is a multi-dimensional assessment designed to address this gap by evaluating physical function, cognition, nutrition, and anemia in just a few minutes. In this version, the tool assigns points based on specific clinical markers: the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test provides one point for a time ≥11.0 seconds and two points for ≥15.0 seconds; the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) provides one point for a score of ≤2 on a 3-point scale; nutritional risk is captured with one point for a BMI \<22.0 or unintentional weight loss of 5% over the last six months; and anemia provides one point based on hemoglobin levels (below 130g/L for men and 120 g/L for women). These modifications were made to enhance feasibility and clinical relevance in our population. Low serum albumin was rare in our cohort and therefore demonstrated limited discriminatory value as a screening marker. In contrast, low BMI and recent weight loss are well-established risk factors for malnutrition and sarcopenia and are readily obtainable in routine preoperative assessment. Similarly, both the TUG and CDT are quick, inexpensive, and require minimal training, making them well suited for large-scale screening in preoperative clinics.Importantly, the proposed components have been evaluated in a pilot study conducted in our institution. This study will evaluate whether a high mEFT score (≥3) is associated with increased postoperative complications and 90-day readmissions among patients aged ≥70 years undergoing major elective surgery. Patients presenting for admission will be included. If mEFT accurately identifies high-risk patients, it may improve preoperative risk stratification, inform shared decision-making, and help identify individuals who could benefit from targeted prehabilitation, supporting broader implementation of frailty screening in surgical care.

Duke Virtual IntEgrated Workflow

This quality improvement initiative aims to evaluate the implementation, utilization, and impact of virtual care technologies and workflows being implemented at Duke University Health System (DUHS). This project is embedded within operational workflows and is designed to inform strategic decision-making and resource allocation. The evaluation will focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) relevant to hospital operations and patient outcomes, including but not limited to: Length of Stay, Readmission Rates, Patient Satisfaction Scores, and Other Quality and Safety Metrics. These KPIs will be evaluated across three clinical units at Duke University Hospital, in which virtual care technologies are being implemented. These will be compared to three control units of similar characteristics. Differences in KPIs will be examined across all units over 12 months.

Comparing Outcomes Of Single Layer Versus Multilayer Leg Closure Techniques Following Great Saphenous Vein Harvesting For CABG

This study aims to address the knowledge gap by comparing the outcomes of single-layer and multi-layer leg closure techniques following great saphenous vein harvesting for Coronary artery bypass grafting. Research question: 1. Does single-layer closure compared to multi-layer closure result in better postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing great saphenous vein harvesting for CABG 2. To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, seroma) associated with single-layer vs. multi-layer closure techniques. participants will follow in OPD after 1 week , their wounds will be examined and assessment will be recorded.