Clinical Research Directory

Comparison of Two Rotational Alignment Methods for Astigmatism Correction in SMILE Surgery

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a commonly used corneal refractive procedure for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. During astigmatism correction, eye rotation between the upright examination position and the supine surgical position may affect the alignment of the astigmatic treatment axis and may contribute to residual astigmatism after surgery. Manual limbal marking is a commonly used method to guide cyclotorsion adjustment during refractive surgery. OcuLign is an assisted cyclotorsion control function of the VISUMAX 800 platform that helps identify ocular rotation and guide axis alignment during SMILE. However, direct clinical evidence comparing OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control with manual limbal marking during SMILE is limited. This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, masked, contralateral-eye non-inferiority trial. Adults aged 18 to 40 years with stable myopia and astigmatism who plan to undergo bilateral SMILE surgery will be enrolled. In each participant, one eye will receive SMILE with OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control, and the fellow eye will receive SMILE with manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment. The treatment assigned to the right eye will be determined by randomization. The primary objective is to compare residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months after surgery between the two methods. Secondary outcomes include visual acuity, refractive predictability and stability, astigmatism vector analysis, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, patient-reported quality of vision, overall satisfaction, and safety outcomes. Participants will be followed for approximately 6 months after surgery.

Comparison of Low- Versus High-Level Angle Kappa Compensation Strategies in SMILE Using the VisuMax 800: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two intraoperative kappa-angle compensation strategies during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the VisuMax 800 platform in patients with relatively large kappa-angle offsets. Angle kappa represents the difference between the visual axis and the pupil center. In patients with a large offset, pupil-centered treatment may lead to decentration of the optical zone, which can induce higher-order aberrations and affect postoperative visual quality. The VisuMax 800 system allows intraoperative adjustment of the treatment center based on the measured offset, making different compensation strategies possible. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does low kappa-angle compensation (50%) result in lower postoperative higher-order aberrations than high compensation (100%)? Does the compensation strategy influence visual acuity, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, and subjective visual quality after SMILE? Are the measurements obtained from different diagnostic devices consistent when evaluating kappa-related parameters? Researchers will compare SMILE with low compensation to SMILE with high compensation to determine which strategy provides better optical quality and visual performance. Participants will: Undergo SMILE surgery using either low or high kappa-angle compensation Complete scheduled postoperative examinations at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months Receive measurements of visual acuity, refraction, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and patient-reported visual outcomes Be monitored for safety outcomes and adverse events during follow-up

The Impact of 'A Miss Is as Good as a Mile': Is Compensation Necessary for Minimal Ocular Deviation in Myopic Laser Surgery?

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of intraoperative kappa-angle compensation on postoperative visual quality in patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the VisuMax 800 platform. The study will enroll patients with myopia and a kappa-angle offset \< 0.2 mm. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does intraoperative kappa-angle compensation reduce postoperative higher-order aberrations after SMILE? Does kappa-angle compensation improve postoperative visual quality and refractive outcomes compared with no compensation? Researchers will compare SMILE with intraoperative kappa-angle compensation to SMILE without compensation to determine whether compensation leads to better optical quality and visual performance. Participants will: Undergo SMILE surgery with or without intraoperative kappa-angle compensation Complete scheduled postoperative examinations at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery Receive measurements of visual acuity, refraction, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and safety outcomes

A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance and Safety of UNICON Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses

13 weeks, open-label, daily disposable contact lens dispensing study.