Clinical Research Directory

Efficacy of the COronary SInus Reducer in Patients With Refractory Angina II

To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Reducer for treatment of patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy who demonstrate objective evidence of reversible myocardial ischemia in the distribution of the left coronary artery and who are deemed unsuitable for revascularization. A non-randomized single-arm registry will further assess the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Reducer in selected subjects with reversible myocardial ischemia in the distribution of the right coronary artery and who are deemed unsuitable for revascularization, subjects without documented obstructive coronary disease and abnormal coronary flow reserve (ANOCA), and subjects who cannot complete an exercise tolerance test due to lower limb amputation (above the ankle) or other physiologic condition with documented chronic mobility or balance issues that require the use of a walking aid.

Assessing the Safety and Effectiveness of Intracoronary Stem Cells in Patients With Refractory Angina

REGENERATE-COBRA will examine whether autologous stem cell treatment can improve angina symptoms and quality of life for patients with refractory angina. Patients will be randomised (randomly allocated with a 50:50 chance) to either the 'treatment' or the 'sham' group - they will not know which group they are in. In the 'treatment' group: * Stem cells will be collected from bone marrow in the patient's hip under local anaesthetic (a bone marrow aspiration). * Under local anaesthetic, the stem cells will be infused into the arteries that supply blood to the heart through a small tube inserted either in the wrist or the groin. * The follow-up involves a phone call at 1 month and 12 months and clinic visit at 6 months. In the 'sham' group: * A sham bone marrow aspiration is performed - a 3mm nick in the skin will be made under local anaesthetic. * A sham cell infusion is performed - a small tube is inserted either in the wrist or groin under local anaesthetic. * The follow-up involves a phone call at 1 month and 12 months and clinic visit at 6 months.

CardiAMP Cell Therapy Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Trial

Prospective, multi-center, 2:1 randomized (Treatment : Sham Control), sham-controlled, double-blinded trial to compare treatment using the CardiAMP cell therapy system to sham treatment Treatment Group: Subjects treated with aBMC using the CardiAMP cell therapy system Sham Control Group: Subjects treated with a Sham Treatment (no introduction of the Helix transendocardial delivery catheter, no administration of aBMC)

Investigational Trial to Evaluate XC001 Delivered Via an Cardiac Catheter in Subjects With Chronic Angina.

This is a two-part study, comprised of an initial open-label run-in phase (Part 1) in a subset of 3 subjects to provide first data regarding safety, and feasibility of the percutaneous endovascular catheter-facilitated intramyocardial delivery of XC001 in patients with RA due to obstructive CAD. Part 1 of the study is comprised of 3 subjects with RA (CCS class II-IV) who will receive 4×1011 viral particles (vp) XC001. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), the committee will review safety and feasibility data and approval to commence enrollment in Part 2 of the study. Part 2 is a randomized, double-blind, sham-procedure control study. Subjects with RA (CCS class II-IV) with no therapeutic options will be randomized 1:1 to either the treatment group with catheter delivery of 4×1011 vp XC001 (approximately N=53) or a sham procedure group (approximately N=53). It is estimated that approximately 106 subjects will be randomized to result in 100 evaluable subjects. All subjects enrolled in Part 1, as well as Part 2 will follow all screening and safety monitoring procedures for up to 12 months (Table 2), and will be included in the safety analysis of the study.

Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation in Patients With Ischaemia and Non-obstructed Coronary Arteries and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

To demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of the CS Reducer for the treatment of patients with ischaemia and non-obstructed coronary arteries (INOCA) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and through a nested mechanistic substudy investigate the physiological responses in the coronary microcirculation responsible for changes in myocardial perfusion.

COSIMA: COronary SInus Reducer for the Treatment of Refractory Microvascular Angina

Patients with refractory microvascular angina fulfilling the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in this randomized trial. The primary objective is to investigate whether the proportion of patients reporting an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class (≥2 classes) is different at six months after implantation of a Coronary Sinus Reducer followed by optimal medical therapy (OMT) compared to OMT alone.

Use of the Neovasc Coronary Sinus Reducer System for the Treatment of Refractory Angina Pectoris in Patients With Ngina Class 3-4 Who Are Not Candidates for Revascularization

The purpose of this study is to implant the Reducer in patients with the symptoms of refractory angina, that suffer from refractory angina who demonstrate reversible ischemia.