Clinical Research Directory

Comparative Study Between Leg Massage and Vibration on Cramps and Comfort for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

This planned randomized controlled trial will enroll 164 patients undergoing hemodialysis to compare the effectiveness of leg massage versus vibration therapy on muscle cramps and patient comfort. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a massage group receiving 20-minute lower extremity massage sessions, a vibration group receiving 10-minute vibration therapy, or a control group receiving standard care only. All interventions will be administered three times per week for two weeks (six sessions). The study will evaluate cramp frequency, cramp severity using a Visual Analog Scale, sleep quality through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and patient comfort scores. Both interventions are expected to significantly reduce cramp frequency and severity compared to standard care, with massage anticipated to show superior benefits for sleep quality and home-based cramp reduction, while vibration is expected to provide better immediate comfort during dialysis sessions. No serious adverse events are predicted. The findings will help healthcare providers offer personalized, evidence-based non-pharmacological options to improve quality of life for hemodialysis patients.

Effects of an Exercise and Diet Program on Biochemistry and Body Composition in Patients With CKD in G1 and G2 Stages

How Exercise, a Controlled Diet and Education Improve the Health of People with Early-Stage Renal Failure: A Study at Ciudad Guzmán Hospital

Ultrasound-Based Prediction of Hemodynamic Instability During CVVHDF Initiation

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the ability of transthoracic echocardiographic and bedside ultrasonographic parameters to predict intradialytic hypotension and hemodynamic instability at the initiation of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in adult intensive care unit patients.

Study to Compare the Outcome of Receiving Continued Immunosuppression Versus Stopping Immunosuppression at 6 Months to Safely Prevent Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Sensitization in Patients With Late Renal Graft Failure

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the degree of HLA sensitization at 2 years in patients with late renal graft failure (\> 3 months) when receiving reduced immunosuppressant treatment versus stopping immunosuppression at 6 months. The main question this study aims to answer is: Does maintaining long-term immunosuppression in patients with a late renal graft failure (\> 3 months) safely reduce the risk of HLA sensitization? To answer this question, patients will be assigned to a control arm or investigational arm: * Patients assigned to the control arm will receive standard treatment, in which immunosuppressant treatment is withdrawn after 6 months. * Patients assigned to the investigatonal arm will continue immunosuppressant treatment at low doses for 2 years. Patients recruited in this clinical trial will be followed for up to 2 years. During this time, patients will visit the clinic every 3 months for checkups and tests.