Clinical Research Directory

Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) on Respiratory Effort: A Pilot Study in Healthy Adults

This pilot randomized crossover study will evaluate the acute effects of immersive virtual reality (IVR) on respiratory effort during submaximal exercise in healthy adults. Dyspnea and increased respiratory effort are influenced not only by mechanical and metabolic factors, but also by emotional and central neural inputs. IVR has shown potential to reduce anxiety, promote relaxation, and modulate physiological responses, but its direct effect on respiratory effort has not been adequately studied. Healthy adults will complete two experimental exercise sessions: one session with IVR and one session without IVR, in randomized order. In both conditions, participants will perform a 6-minute constant-load cycling test at a submaximal workload individualized from a prior incremental exercise test. Respiratory effort will be assessed continuously using esophageal pressure monitoring. Additional measurements will include ventilatory variables, perceived dyspnea, acute state anxiety, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and heart rate variability. The primary aim is to determine whether IVR reduces respiratory effort compared with the control condition. This pilot study is intended to provide physiological evidence on the potential role of IVR as a non-pharmacological strategy to modulate respiratory effort and dyspnea, and to inform future research in clinical populations.

Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus and Estimation of Respiratory Effort During the Transition to Spontaneous Ventilation

In intensive care units, many critically ill patients need help from a machine called a ventilator to breathe. Once these patients start to recover, doctors try to gradually reduce this support and help them breathe on their own again. However, not all patients are ready to be taken off the ventilator right away. During this transition, it's important to find the right amount of help-enough to support their breathing, but not so much that the machine does all the work for them. This study focuses on a special type of ventilator setting called Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+). Unlike traditional modes, which give a fixed level of support, PAV+ adjusts the amount of help it gives based on how hard the patient is trying to breathe. The more effort a patient makes, the more support the machine provides-and vice versa. This can make breathing feel more natural and may protect the lungs and breathing muscles during recovery. Modern ventilators also display a measurement called "Work of Breathing," which tells how much effort the patient is using to breathe. This study wants to find out whether this measurement from the ventilator is a reliable way to monitor a patient's breathing effort, compared to other more invasive or complex methods. The research will include 20 adult patients who are recovering in the ICU and have been on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. All patients will have already met some criteria showing they're ready to begin breathing more on their own, but are not quite ready to have the breathing tube removed. Each patient will go through different levels of PAV+ support, and researchers will record how much effort they make to breathe using several methods, including special pressure sensors and data from the ventilator. The goal of the study is to better understand how to measure breathing effort safely and easily, and to improve how we support patients as they recover the ability to breathe on their own. If successful, this could help reduce complications and improve recovery for people on ventilators. There are no added risks or costs for the patients involved. All equipment used in the study is already part of regular ICU care. Participation requires informed consent and the privacy of all participants will be fully protected.

Ventilator Mode and Respiratory Physiology

Modern intensive care units (ICUs) are increasingly adopting newer modes of mechanical ventilation such as adaptive pressure control (APC) modes but there are limited data available regarding risks and benefits of newer modes versus traditional ventilation modes. APC can inadvertently deliver high tidal volumes, which maybe harmful. High tidal volumes may be unrecognized by the provider, due to the complexities of ventilator algorithms and patient interactions. The objective of this aim is to identify risk factors for excess tidal volumes in patients on adaptive pressure control.