Clinical Research Directory

Reliability and Accuracy of a New Clinical Test for Biceps Lesions

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a new physical examination test (referred to as Said's test) for diagnosing injuries to the biceps tendon in the shoulder, specifically lesions of the long head of the biceps and SLAP tears. Diagnosing biceps injuries during a physical exam can be challenging, and existing standard tests can vary in their accuracy. This study aims to determine if this newly developed physical test is a more sensitive, specific, and reliable tool for doctors to use in a clinical setting. The study will enroll 144 adult participants (ages 18 to 70). These participants will be categorized into three groups: patients with isolated SLAP lesions, patients with complex shoulder injuries (such as a rotator cuff tear combined with a biceps lesion), and a control group of healthy individuals or asymptomatic shoulders. During the study, each participant will be examined by two independent doctors who are blinded to the patient's actual diagnosis. The doctors will perform the new physical test alongside traditional shoulder tests (the Speed's and O'Brien tests). To determine the true accuracy of these physical exams, the doctors' findings will be compared against definitive diagnostic methods, which will include an MRI, an MRA, or direct visualization during shoulder arthroscopy. By comparing the physical exam results to the gold standard imaging or surgical findings, researchers will calculate the new test's sensitivity, specificity, and inter-observer reliability.

Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior ( SLAP) From Type II to Type IV

Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior ( SLAP) From Type II to Type IV

Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double-loop 360 lasso biceps tenodesis for the treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) during shoulder arthroscopy in patients without arthroscopic rotator cuff tears. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. However, these studies were carried out on patients with rotator cuff tears, and so it has not been possible to directly compare the two procedures. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis in patients without rotator cuff tears. Given its potential advantages, autobloc biceps tenodesis could become the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with long biceps tendon pathology.