Clinical Research Directory

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology

This is a non-randomized, multi-center, open-label, prospective clinical study evaluating the clinical treatment with Candela Medical Technology.

PMCF Investigation of Medical Device ChitoCare® Medical

This is a post-marketing observational clinical investigation conducted as part of the post-market clinical follow-up of ChitoCare® Medical, aimed to confirm safety and efficacy according to the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, for the following indications: Gel - scars, conditions after dermatosurgical procedures, dermatitis, acne Spray - conditions after dermatosurgical procedures, dermatitis, acne

AVAVA MIRIA General Use

A general protocol to treat a variety of dermatologic conditions and collect patient feedback. Primary outcome is the collection and analysis of patient questionnaires related to the overall experience of the device treatment. Secondary outcome measures include physician and subject evaluations in regards to improvement seen in the device as well as assessment of side effects.

AV-23-001 AVAVA MIRIA Pilot Study

This non-significant risk study is intended to demonstrate the use of the MIRIA Skin Treatment System can show improvement in dermatologic conditions currently indicated for treatment with a laser (such as, but not limited to, benign pigmented lesions, benign cutaneous lesions, wrinkles, textural irregularities, or scars). The study is also intended to assist in determination of the optimal laser configuration and treatment parameters that most consistently yield results.

Autologous Nanofat Grafting by Injection Versus With Microneedling in Post-burn and Traumatic Atrophic Scars

This study aims to evaluate the efficiency autologous nanofat injection versus autologous nanofat delivered by microneedling in management of post burn atrophic and traumatic scars.

Microneedling With Regular Insulin Versus Microneedling Alone in Treatment of Atrophic Scars

Recently, few studies have attempted to test the regenerative effects of human insulin application by microneedling on atrophic scars versus other topical preparations. However, the scars were limited etiologically to acne scars. In addition, a lack of inclusion of a control group instead of comparing topical preparations with insulin was also a limitation to these studies. A control group consisting of microneedling alone would have served as a better comparison in order to determine whether the effects of microneedling are augmented by topical protein-rich preparations.

Treatment of Hypopigmented Scars With Bimatoprost

Patients who have hypo-pigmented burn scar will have two scars chosen and randomized to treated scar and control scar. The subject will then have both scars treated with fractional ablative CO2 laser (FLSR). The treated scar will have bimatoprost delivered through the laser channels, while the control will have the vehicle (normal saline) only delivered. The treatment will continue for 14 days with twice daily application. The scars will then be monitored at a 2-week follow-up visit where levels of melanin will be evaluated. Tissue punch biopsies will also be used to evaluate the mechanism of action of bimatoprost. Treatment will occur for 6 sessions at 4-6 week intervals including follow- up visits and evaluations.