Clinical Research Directory

Procizumab (PCZ; AK1967) in Critical Cardiovascular Care

The objective of this Phase 1b trial is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of procizumab, a monoclonal antibody under development for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). CS is a life-threatening hypoperfusion of vital organs that frequently results in death. In addition to safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procizumab are evaluated to define the optimum phase 2 dose (P2D) of procizumab.

Digital Out-of-hospital Management on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Early Cardiogenic Shock

This clinical study was a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 472 patients with early-stage cardiogenic shock were recruited and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 236 cases in each group. The HeartMed-HF digital out-of-hospital management was used to manage the patients in the experimental group, while the patients in the control group were managed according to the discharge guidance. The primary endpoints were 1-year all-cause mortality and unplanned readmission after randomization (excluding emergency department visits). Secondary endpoints (at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-randomization) were: all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for HF, recurrent MI, ischemia-driven repeat revascularization, stroke, BARC 3-5 grade major bleeding, unplanned formal rehospitalization, types of GDMT medications or GDMT target dose achievement rate.

Mobile Education and Telephone Monitoring for ICD Patients: Effects on Anxiety, Acceptance, and Self-Efficacy

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the effect of a mobile education program and telephone monitoring developed for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) on shock anxiety, device acceptance, and self-efficacy. Method: The study was designed as a single-blind, randomized controlled trial consisting of two phases. In the first phase, the Mobile ICD Education Program (M-ICDEP) was developed. In the second phase, the effectiveness of M-ICDEP was evaluated through a randomized controlled design with 88 ICD patients who attended routine battery check-ups. Research data were collected through the mobile education program using the Personal Information Form, Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS), Florida Patient Acceptance Scale (FPAS), and the Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Scales After ICD Implantation (OE-ICD and SB-ICD). Additionally, patients underwent a shock management simulation via M-ICDEP, and their data were assessed using the Shock Management Control Form, which was included in the evaluation of shock anxiety. Patients in both the intervention and control groups used M-ICDEP for three months. The control group had access only to the brief educational booklet section containing general information, while the intervention group had access to all sections. Patients in the intervention group also received telephone follow-ups during the second, fifth, and eighth weeks of the monitoring period. Data were collected twice: once before the intervention (pre-test) and once in the third month (post-test). Statistical analyses will conducted using the SAS 9.4 software package.

Ciprofol's Impact on Oxygenator Function in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Patients

This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of Ciprofol, a new sedative, in critically ill patients receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), a life-support system for heart or lung failure. The investigation aims to: Assess how Ciprofol affects the oxygenator, a critical ECMO component responsible for adding oxygen to blood. Compare the safety of Ciprofol to midazolam, a commonly used sedative. Eligibility Criteria Adults aged 18 years or older. Patients receiving ECMO and mechanical ventilation for over 72 hours. Individuals requiring sedation for medical procedures. Study Protocol Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Ciprofol Group: Initial sedation dose of 0.1 mg/kg, adjusted as needed. Midazolam Group: Initial sedation dose of 0.05 mg/kg, adjusted as needed. Both groups will receive pain management with remifentanil. Sedation levels will be adjusted daily by the clinical team to ensure patient safety and comfort. Outcome Measures Primary: Oxygenator performance (oxygen and carbon dioxide levels) on Days 3 and 7. Secondary: Changes in blood triglyceride and clotting marker (D-dimer) levels, oxygenator lifespan before replacement, and safety outcomes such as low blood pressure, respiratory issues, or allergic reactions. Significance ECMO patients often require prolonged sedation, but current sedatives like midazolam may contribute to oxygenator damage. Ciprofol's potential for faster recovery and fewer side effects could improve sedation practices and device longevity in this high-risk population.

CAPITAL DOREMI 2: Inotrope Versus Placebo Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock

The investigators are interested in determining if there is a meaningful benefit from the use of medications purported to increase the pumping function of the heart (i.e. inotropes) among critically ill patients admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU). To do this, the investigators will conduct a multi-centre, double blind, randomized control trial with patients who are deemed to require these medications by their treating physician to one of the two most commonly used agents in Canada (Milrinone or Dobutamine) or placebo. Each patient will be closely monitored by their healthcare team. The dose of medication will be adjusted according to each patients' clinical status. After 12 hours, the participants will move to open label treatment and any continued use of inotropes will be at the discretion of their treating physician.

ECMO LEft Ventricle UNloading Strategy

The present study is an International multicentric prospective observational cohort study. This will be an international research campaign to prospectively collect and analyze clinical data of all VA ECLS patients admitted to participating ICUs with a focus on LV venting modalities. The aims of the study are: * To investigate the meaning of LV overload during veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal life support; * To extensively describe the left ventricular (LV) unloading strategy during VA extracorporeal life support in a large prospective international cohort. * To compare different strategies to unload the left ventricular in terms of efficacy and outcomes;

GLP-1 and Hyperoxia for Organ Protection in Heart Surgery

Patients undergoing open heart surgery are at risk of suffering damage to the heart, brain and kidneys. This study is designed as a 2-by-2 randomized clinical trial with the purpose of investigating the organ protective effects of the glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist Exenatide versus placebo and restrictive versus liberal oxygenation during weaning from cardio-pulmonary bypass.

Hemodynamic Comparison of Peripheral and Central VA ECMO.

The goal of this clinical trial is to monitor hemodynamic differences between central veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and peripheral VA ECMO. The main question it aims to answer is: * Efficacy of the different cannulation strategies for the establishment of for VA-ECMO circulation on hemodynamics and organ perfusion. Participants require VA ECMO support, will be divided into two groups in an intention-to-treat analysis: central artery cannulation and peripheral artery cannulation. Researchers will analyze different cannulation strategies for VA-ECMO and identify potential advantages and disadvantages for two groups of VA-ECMO.