Clinical Research Directory

Mapping the Healthcare Pathway to Multidisciplinary Assessment of 12-25 Year Olds With Somatic Symptom Disorder

This study aims to describe the course of successive care events that follow individuals with somatic symptom disorder until they are assessed by a specialized multidisciplinary team. Data is collected during interviews with subjects aged 12 to 25 years old accompanied by their parents. A biographical grid is used to retrospectively identify all care events that occurred from first symptoms until multidisciplinary assessment. Life events and symptoms are collected as well to explore how history of healthcare consumption is linked to other trajectories. A qualitative analysis of the recorded interviews aims to describe the subjective experience of this healthcare pathway.

Ultra-brief Psychological Treatments for Emotional Symptoms and Disorders

The main objective of this randomized clinical trial is to study if various modalities of brief (eight sessions) and ultra-brief (four sessions) transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral treatment work for decrease emotional symptoms and disorders, as well as to find out which variables of cognition and of the intervention process itself are involved in the therapeutic improvement. The investigators will compare the interventions of four groups: brief group treatment (1), ultra-brief group treatment (2), ultra-brief individual treatment (3) with the ultra-brief relaxation (control) group. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Will the brief and ultra-brief treatment formats works better than the relaxation-based control group? * Will results obtained between the brief group therapy group and the ultra-brief group therapy group be similar? * Will the individual ultra brief therapy be more effective than the two group therapies because of common factors, such as the therapeutic alliance? * Will group therapies be more beneficial for cost and in terms of capability to reduce emocional symptoms than individual therapy? Participants will be randomly assigned to each of the groups and will receive the corresponding treatment, with different number of sessions. They will answer a series of questionnaires at the beginning and at the end of the intervention, as well as 3 months and 6 months after the end of the treatment.

Ketamine Safety and Tolerability in Psychiatric Inpatient Care (KetGD)

This observational registry aims to collect real-world data on ketamine use in psychiatric inpatients within a regional tertiary-reference center. The study evaluates the safety and tolerability of ketamine administration in individuals with treatment-resistant mental disorders, characterized by diverse comorbidities, heterogeneous disease courses, and variations in treatment responses based on illness stage and severity with a subset of patients with remitted-recurrent and treatment-resistant or chronic presentations. The registry is designed to systematically document adverse events, side effects, and patient-reported outcomes, providing a comprehensive assessment of both the short- and long-term effects of ketamine in psychopharmacology. By generating real-world evidence, this study shall contribute to a more nuanced understanding of ketamine's risk-benefit profile in clinical practice, particularly in subpopulations that are underrepresented in clinical trials. The findings prioritize the support for the refinement of treatment protocols and enhance patient safety in psychiatric care.

Cost-benefit Evaluation of a Transdiagnostic Psychological Treatment for Emotional Disorders in Primary Care

The aim of this study is to compare, in cost-effectiveness and cost-utility terms, a brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural therapy in two different modes, individual and group, with the treatment usually administered in primary care (TAU). Participants between 18 and 65 years old and with, according to the pretreatment evaluation, mild to moderate emotional disorders will be randomly allocated to the three clusters. They will be assessed again immediately after treatment and 6 and 12 months later. The study hypotheses expect to find (H1) the individual treatment generally as effective as the group one, whereas (H2) the TAU will be the least effective. (H3) The group therapy is expected to get the best results in terms of cost-effectiveness and (H4) the TAU will get the worst cost-effectiveness results. Furthermore, (H5) it is expected to find these results across the follow-up assessments too.