Clinical Research Directory

Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical

Multicenter Post market clinical follow-up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical - Prospective, pure data collection of all Ennovate Cervical patients in Total Indications

CLUBE (UBE Stability / Dynamic Radio)

Degenerative pathologies of the spine affect a large proportion of the increasingly ageing population, and are a major public health issue. When conservative treatments (physiotherapy, analgesics, infiltrations) fail, surgical treatment is preferred. Traditionally, a simple lumbar recalibration operation is preferred (bilateral laminectomy decompression), but this may affect spinal stability. In cases of spondylolisthesis or preoperative instability, lumbar fusion (arthrodesis) is sometimes necessary to avoid the risk of major instability, but such an operation is not without risk and may require repeat surgery. The development of new surgical techniques such as uni or bilateral laminotomies, which are less radical, has made it possible to avoid some arthrodeses. Nowadays, the emergence of new surgical techniques such as endoscopy has further reduced the risk of destabilization (shorter post-operative convalescence, less atrophy of the paraspinal muscles) and improved surgeon comfort (better vision and easier instrument handling). Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is one of two endoscopic techniques and has proven its effectiveness for lumbar decompression in terms of clinical benefits. However, there is no scientific evidence on spinal stability after recalibration under UBE. We believe that minimizing invasiveness with UBE during simple lumbar recalibration surgery can preserve spinal stability, thereby reducing the need for lumbar fixation and lowering the cost of care. We therefore propose to study the maintenance of spinal stability using dynamic radiography at 3 months post-operatively in patients undergoing lumbar recalibration surgery with UBE.

Flexion-Extension Radiograph Imaging Protocol Reliability Study

Orthopedic surgeons often face the dilemma of whether to add fusion to a decompression procedure of the spine. Their decision mainly relies on personal experience to determine if a level is unstable preoperatively or if a specific decompression procedure might destabilize the spine. Lumbar spine flexion-extension radiographs aim to provide clinicians with images to assess the dynamism of a vertebral level, which crucial for evaluating spinal instability. However, the lack of a standardized imaging protocol for taking such flexion-extension radiographs leads to wide variability in their quality. This impacts the efficacy of radiographic measurements of angular and translational motion used for diagnosis. To effectively and reliably diagnose instability, it is crucial to control and standardize the flexion-extension radiograph protocols to promote the repeatability of intervertebral motion that characterizes a patient's full range of motion. The objective of this study is to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a standardized flexion - extension radiograph imaging protocol for the lumbar spine. This is an exploratory reliability study. A non-probability purposive sample of 45 patients with back pain from two tertiary care hospitals in The Netherlands is used. There is bo intervention. The main study parameter/endpoint is the agreement between the participants' first ("test") and second ("retest") kinematic results from their lumbar flexion-extension radiographs.

Intraoperative Monitoring for the Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure

This study is designed to evaluate the clinical utility of a known intraoperative neuromonitoring modality (SSEP) using saphenous nerve as the site of stimulation to identify changes to the lumbar nerves which may be at risk during the lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure.