Clinical Research Directory

Extended Prophylactic Anticoagulation Following Spinal Surgery for Metastatic Disease

People who have surgery on their spine to treat cancer that has spread (metastatic disease) have a high chance of developing dangerous blood clots in the legs or lungs. These blood clots are called deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). In a review of patients at UPMC who had this type of surgery, about 15 out of 100 developed a blood clot within 90 days of leaving the hospital. Right now, patients receive blood-thinning medicine only while they are in the hospital after surgery. Once they go home, the medicine is stopped. There are no guidelines telling doctors whether blood-thinning medicine should continue after patients go home from spine surgery for cancer. However, for other types of major cancer surgery, studies have shown that continuing blood-thinning medicine for about 4 weeks after surgery can help prevent blood clots. This study will test whether taking a blood-thinning medicine called apixaban (brand name Eliquis) by mouth for 30 days after leaving the hospital can help prevent blood clots in patients who have had spine surgery for cancer that has spread. The dose used in this study (2.5 mg twice a day) is the same dose approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing blood clots after hip and knee replacement surgery. About 50 adults at UPMC will take part. Participants will take apixaban for 30 days starting the day after hospital discharge. The study team will call participants by phone three times - about 2 days, 31 days, and 91 days after discharge - to check on their health, ask about any bleeding or blood clot symptoms, and assess medication use. No extra clinic visits are required. Results will be compared to a group of 68 patients who had the same type of surgery in the past but did not take apixaban after leaving the hospital. The main goal is to find out if apixaban reduces the rate of blood clots within 90 days of hospital discharge. The study will also track bleeding events and other side effects to determine if this approach is safe. The study hypothesis is that extended blood-thinning medicine after surgery will reduce blood clots compared to the current approach of stopping this medicine at hospital discharge.

Efficacy of Angiographic Embolization vs Non-embolization of Moderate/Poor Vascularized Vertebral Metastases on Intraoperative Bleeding During Surgery Decompression and Vertebral Stabilization.

Although angiographic embolization has been introduced for preoperative management of spine metastases in 1975 and is suggested today by many authors in the management of such pathologies, it needs to be confirmed by RCT. It is a minimally invasive procedure, not free from complications. The recent meta-analyzes, due to the limited number of patients included are not exhaustive about the effectiveness of embolization in the reduction of the intraoperative bleeding, especially in the context of poor / moderate metastasis vascularization. We want to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative angiographic embolization of intermediate / poor vascularized spine metastases in reducing intraoperative blood loss during excision surgery.

Short Interval Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) After Surgical Intervention for Spine Metastases

Current guidelines suggest postoperative spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) should be delivered within 2-4 weeks after surgery. This approach is rife with logistical complications that create delays and barriers for patients accessing care. An alternative approach delivers postoperative spine SBRT soon after surgery, starting within a single hospital stay. This study will investigate the effects of short-term postoperative spine SBRT on wound complications in a safety lead-in, then will transition to a phase 2 trial investigating local tumor control.

A Phase II Trial Evaluating Radiation Boost to Painful Spinal Metastases

Spine SBRT is considered a standard of care for the treatment of spinal metastases. Compared to conventional radiation therapy, spine SBRT delivers high doses of radiation to the affected areas to the spinal metastases. This study is interested in seeing whether an additional 'boost' of radiation, delivered to the affected area in the spine, will result in better long-term control of the tumor; help reduce pain; and reduce long-term side effects of radiation therapy.