Clinical Research Directory

Nebulized Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid on Surgical Field Quality in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries

Intraoperative bleeding is one of the vital problems for anesthesiologists and surgeons, during endoscopic nasal surgery; where the surgical field is very limited and surrounded by vital structures. The tinniest amount of blood in such surgical field can obscure the anatomy and clog the tip of the endoscope, requiring repeated irrigations and suctioning; both of which have traumatic effects on the friable nasal mucosa. Anesthetic techniques to minimize bleeding during endoscopic nasal surgery are of primary importance for a safe and effective procedure, reducing operative time and shortening post-operative recovery. Good surgical conditions could be achieved with systemic, topical, or regional anesthetic techniques. The use of topical and regional techniques has been gaining popularity in recent years as an alternative to the administration of heavy premedication, high narcotic doses, intravenous lignocaine, clonidine, calcium channel blockers, sodium nitroprusside, beta-adrenergic blockers, and magnesium sulfate, which may produce a lack of alertness, respiratory depression, hypoxia, nausea and vomiting, and delayed recovery. Recent studies have shown that the use of tranexamic acid could be a safe and effective management option for hemostasis in a wide range of specialties. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic lysine derivative that blocks the lysine binding site on plasminogen, thus inactivating its conversion to plasmin and hence attenuating its fibrinolysis effects. When given as a one-time operative systemic dose, it can reduce intraoperative surgical blood loss. More recently, it has been used in its nebulized or topical form to treat bleeding in anatomically sequestered areas. Its use has been described for epistaxis, cancer-related hemoptysis, and post-tonsillectomy bleeding. Though systemic doses of tranexamic acid have proven their efficiency in reducing intraoperative bleeding, other forms of administration have not been widely researched. The use of nebulized form is expected to provide a targeted route and localized effect with reduced systemic side effects. Adverse effects of systemic administration of tranexamic acid include seizures, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, anaphylaxis, and other visual disturbance. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of pre-emptive nebulized tranexamic acid versus intravenous tranexamic acid on endoscopic visualization and bleeding rate during endoscopic sinus surgeries.

Effect of Adding Dexamethasone to Bupivacaine 0.25% in SCPB on Surgical Field Visibility During Tympanomastoid Surgery

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of adding dexamethasone to bupivacaine 0.25% in ultrasound-guided SCPB on surgical field visibility during tympanomastoid surgery.

Bupivacaine 0.125% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Tympanomastoid Surgeries in Adults

Bleeding is one of the most common complications in tympanomastoid surgery that could prolong the time of operation and also might lead to morbidity. Pain is also one of the most annoying complications of tympanomastoid surgeries. Thus, adequate surgical field visualization is utmost important. A bloodless field allows optimal exposure and identification of vital neurovascular structures. Even small bleeding, inconsequential for the patient's volume status, can create great technical difficulty in the confined space of the tympan, leading to prolonged surgery, incomplete procedures, and increased complications. The use of regional nerve blocks as an alternative to hypotensive anesthesia has gained popularity in recent years. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides effective analgesia and reduces sympathetic activity, resulting in reduced bleeding and improved surgical conditions. The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) provides sensory innervation to the ear and surrounding structures, reducing pain perception during and after surgery. This is the first randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of combined general anesthesia with SCPB using 0.125% versus 0.25% bupivacaine during tympanomastoid surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of bupivacaine 0.125% \& 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery on operative field visualization, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesia. The investigators hypothesize that bupivacaine 0.125% would be non-inferior to bupivacaine 0.25% in achieving optimal surgical field visualization, hemodynamic stability, surgeon satisfaction and postoperative analgesia. This prospective double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 patients between 21 to 70 years, with ASA I-II and undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. Participants were equally divided into two groups: Group A: Patients received SCPB using 0.25% bupivacaine (5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5ml normal saline). Group B: Patients received SCPB using 0.125% bupivacaine (2.5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 7.5ml normal saline).