Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

2 clinical studies listed.

Filters:

Surgical Technique Comparison

Tundra lists 2 Surgical Technique Comparison clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.

This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.

COMPLETED

NCT07573423

Linear Versus Purse String Skin Closure at Loop Ileostomy Reversal.

This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare two commonly used skin closure techniques-linear closure and purse-string closure-after loop ileostomy reversal surgery. Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications following stoma closure, leading to increased patient discomfort, prolonged hospital stay, and higher healthcare costs. In this trial, eligible adult patients undergoing elective loop ileostomy reversal are randomly assigned to either linear skin closure or purse-string skin closure. The purse-string technique leaves a small central opening that allows drainage, which may reduce infection risk, whereas linear closure involves complete approximation of the wound edges. All patients are managed according to standard hospital protocols and are followed during their hospital stay and for 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay and operative time. The purpose of this study is to determine which closure technique provides better outcomes in terms of reducing postoperative infections and improving recovery. The findings may help guide surgeons in selecting the most effective and safe method for skin closure after ileostomy reversal.

Gender: All

Ages: 20 Years - 70 Years

Updated: 2026-05-12

1 state

Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Ileostomy Closure
Surgical Technique Comparison
NOT YET RECRUITING

NCT07056868

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Extraperitoneal Stoma Creation Via the Arcuate Line Approach Versus Conventional Transperitoneal Stoma Formation for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare two surgical techniques for stoma creation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The trial evaluates whether an extraperitoneal stoma created via the arcuate line approach can reduce the risk of developing parastomal hernia compared to the conventional transperitoneal stoma formation. Parastomal hernia is a common complication after stoma surgery, often requiring additional treatment or surgery. By testing a novel surgical route that avoids entering the abdominal cavity, this study aims to improve postoperative outcomes and quality of life for patients requiring a permanent stoma.

Gender: All

Ages: 18 Years - 80 Years

Updated: 2025-07-09

Parastomal Hernia
Rectal Surgery
Stoma Complications
+2