Clinical Research Directory

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy (PNT) vs Percutaneous Ultrasonic Needle Tenotomy (PUT) for Gluteal Tendinosis

The goal of this study is to determine if a newer tenotomy technique utilizing an ultrasound needle is more effective than the traditional tenotomy technique utilizing a simple hypodermic needle for gluteal tendinosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is pain from the gluteal tendinosis improved with either technique, and, if so, is there a difference in the improvement between techniques? 2. Is there an improvement in function for gluteal tendinosis, and, if so, is there a difference between techniques?

Treatment of Tendinosis Using the TenJet Hydroresection System

Treatment of recalcitrant tendinopathy remains a clinical challenge for physicians without a minimally invasive treatment option that can consistently provide patients with a long-term relief from chronic pain and ability to return to function. Surgical debridement of degenerative tendon tissue has long been the standard of care to treat degenerative tendon pathology once all conservative or minimally invasive treatment options have failed. Ultrasound guided tenotomy is an emerging treatment option with the potential to address the underlying degenerative, diseased tissue, by selectively resecting and removing the tissue in a minimally invasive manner. Additionally, with the availability of in-office diagnostic ultrasound imaging, physicians now have an opportunity to evaluate and classify underlying tendon pathology during a clinical exam. This study is to evaluate outcomes in patients presenting with a clinical history of recalcitrant tendinopathy with confirmed diagnosis of degenerative tendinosis using diagnostic ultrasound imaging or MRI.