Clinical Research Directory

Study of Efficacy of the MyoTrain System in a Population of Individuals With Trans-radial Limb Loss

The investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of MyoTrain in a prospective clinical study involving 16 individuals with trans-radial upper-limb loss over a period of 206 days. These individuals will be randomized to Group A (Control Group using standard motor imagery training) and Group B (who are provided the MyoTrain system). The investigators will test three hypotheses: 1. The use of MyoTrain results in skills transference to control of the final prosthesis 2. The virtual outcome measures in MyoTrain are correlated with real-world functional outcome measures 3. The use of MyoTrain results in improved clinical outcomes as measured by functional, subjective and usage metrics Following a baseline functional assessment, participants will undergo a 30-day pre-prosthetic training period specific to their assigned Group. After this training period, participants will receive their prosthetic device and occupational therapy consistent with the current clinical care standard, after which they will again undergo clinical assessment. Post-device delivery, participants will then complete 3 56-day blocks of at-home prosthesis use, in between which they will return to clinic for assessment.

Analysis of Neuromodulation as a Complementary Treatment to Evidence-based Clinical Intervention in Subjects With Musculoskeletal Pathology of the Upper Limb: a Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

This project aims to analyze the use of neuromodulation within a treatment protocol for musculoskeletal conditions of the upper limb, as well as to determine the difference between two and three sessions per week. Study participants will be divided into four intervention groups: the first will receive two sessions per week for a period of six months, while the second will receive three sessions per week for the same period. The treatment protocol will consist of therapeutic physical exercise focused on the muscles and joints of the lower limb, stretching of the involved muscles, and neuromodulation of the brachial plexus nerve root, which innervates the affected structures. The third and fourth intervention groups will receive the same treatment as mentioned above, but without neuromodulation. The third group will receive three sessions per week, while the second group will receive two sessions per week. Two different types of measurement variables will be used: objective variables will be used to measure range of motion and muscle strength. Subjective variables will also be used through validated questionnaires, covering physical activity, health-related quality of life, upper limb function, and a visual analog scale for pain perception.

The Effects of a Dynamic Arm Support in Daily Life

The goal of this mixed method study is to learn about how a dynamic arm support device (DAS) helps people with everyday activities. The study focuses on people with neuro(-muscular) conditions, age 16 and older. The research questions that are formulated, are: * How does a person experience their daily activities, with and without a DAS? * What are the contextual (external and personal) factors that influence the use of a DAS? Participants will take part in three testing sessions. In each session, they must complete a few questionnaires and participate in an interview. The first time, without DAS. In the second and third session, they will be using their DAS (resp. 3 to 4 weeks and 3 months). The data collection will be executed by phone, digital questionnaires and/or paper.

Regulatory Clearance of the Glide Control Strategy for Upper Limb Prostheses

The investigators will test the following hypothesis: Use of Glide results in improved functional performance, satisfaction, and usage metrics as compared to use of a standard Direct Control (DC) prosthesis. This study will compare the use of Glide \[Experimental\] prosthesis with a DC \[Standard\] prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. We will follow a multiple baseline design, specifically an AB design. Each of the subjects will use the Experimental and Standard systems over a total of 24-weeks. The A phase is the baseline phase where the DC prosthesis will be used, and the B phase will be the treatment phase where the Glide prosthesis will be used. Participants will undergo an A phase of either 10-weeks, 12-weeks, or 14-weeks duration, with the remaining 14-, 12-, or 10-weeks of the study being dedicated to the B phase.

Additional Effects of Kinesio-Taping Along with Conservative Physical Therapy on Upper Limb Function, Range of Motion and Spasticity in the Patients with Subacute Stroke

A randomized control trial will be done on diagnosed stroke patients of subacute stage in Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawalpindi and leading edge physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic.The purpose of the study is to determine Additional Effects of Kinesio-Taping along with conservative Physical Therapy on upper limb function, Range of motion and Spasticity in the patients with Subacute Stroke. The conservational physical therapy includes Passive and active ROMs 25 repetitions each, 3 times per week. PNF stretching (hold relax) for spastic muscles for 20 repetitions with a 10 second hold and 10 second relaxation of the muscle group 3 times per week. D1 flexion and extension for 20 repetitions 3 times per week. Kinesio tape 3 times per week. (Anchor opposed to effected compartment to provide facilitation and sustained stretch). with srtrngth training included in week 3-6 with a resistance band of medium resistance. treatment time will be 30 minutes on alternate days for six weeks.

Tailoring Upper Limb Exercise Advice for People With Parkinson Disease

The investigators will explore the impact of hand cycling, on hand function in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). The study will compare the effects of two different hand cycling approaches-steady-state and interval efforts-on improving hand dexterity in people with PD. Conducted as a clinical trial, it aims to understand if a single session of hand cycling can temporarily enhance hand function and if the nature of the exercise influences the benefit.