Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 Valvular Heart Disease Stenosis and Regurgitation (Diagnosis) clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07057466
Prospective Evaluation of AI-ECG for SHD Detection
AI-ECG-SHD is a multicentre prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study evaluating artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) for the detection of structural heart disease in adults undergoing clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Participants undergo standard 12-lead ECG acquisition together with ECG recordings obtained using portable or wearable single-, 3-, and 6-lead devices. Established AI-ECG models will be evaluated for the detection of heart failure, pulmonary hypertension and valvular heart disease using TTE as the clinical reference standard, with performance compared across ECG acquisition modalities within the same prospective cohort. AI-ECG predictions are generated offline and are not provided to treating clinicians or used to alter clinical care. The study will also compare AI-ECG performance with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a combined AI-ECG and NT-proBNP approach. The study aims to recruit 590 participants across six NHS hospital sites. A prespecified subgroup of 203 participants will undergo dedicated venous blood sampling for NT-proBNP; eligible same-day NT-proBNP measurements obtained as part of routine clinical care will also be included where available.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 90 Years
Updated: 2026-10-08
NCT07251660
Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery Via Right Thoracotomy and Conventional Valve Surgery Via Sternotomy.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare early postoperative outcomes between Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery (MIVS) via right thoracotomy and Conventional Valve Surgery via median sternotomy in patients undergoing elective, isolated mitral or aortic valve surgery. Minimally invasive techniques are believed to reduce postoperative pain, ventilation time, chest drain output, and wound complications, but evidence from Pakistan is limited. The study will enroll patients of all ages and genders who are scheduled for isolated valvular procedures at Chaudhary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC), Multan. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo either minimally invasive thoracotomy or conventional sternotomy. Primary outcomes include ventilation time, CPB duration, cross-clamp time, pain scores, and chest drain output. Secondary outcomes include wound healing (Day 7 and 30 days), return to routine activity, echocardiographic evaluation, transfusion requirements, and 30-day mortality. Findings from this study may provide evidence to guide the adoption of minimally invasive valvular surgery techniques in low-resource and developing settings.
Gender: All
Updated: 2025-11-26