Clinical Research Directory

Comparative Evaluation of Preoperative Preparation Methods in Patients With Large Incisional Hernias

Patients with large, complex, or giant incisional hernias often require advanced preoperative optimization to facilitate safe abdominal wall reconstruction and reduce postoperative complications. Several strategies are currently used in clinical practice, including botulinum toxin A injection, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, and their combination. However, the optimal differentiated approach based on hernia characteristics and abdominal wall tissue deficiency remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of different preoperative preparation strategies in patients with large postoperative ventral hernias and loss of abdominal wall domain. Outcomes of patients receiving botulinum toxin A, progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum, combined preparation, or no specific preparation will be analyzed. The study will evaluate operative feasibility, ability to achieve fascial closure, postoperative complications, recurrence, and overall treatment outcomes.

Cost-Effectiveness of Retromuscular Hernia Repair

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of retromuscular midline ventral hernia repair using open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Patients undergoing elective repair are included and followed to assess postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence and quality of life. In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. The study is currently ongoing.

ORION Study: Mesh Position and Risk During Subsequent Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery

Ventral hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed abdominal surgical procedures worldwide, increasingly carried out using minimally invasive techniques. In this setting, mesh reinforcement is standard practice, but the optimal anatomical plane for mesh placement remains debated. Intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal mesh positions may have different long-term consequences, particularly when patients undergo subsequent abdominal surgery. However, prospective data evaluating the impact of prior mesh position on reoperative risk and postoperative outcomes are limited. The ORION study is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study designed to evaluate the impact of prior minimally invasive ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal mesh placement on subsequent minimally invasive abdominal surgery. The primary objective is to compare the incidence of intraoperative visceral injury during adhesiolysis between the two mesh positions. Secondary objectives include the assessment of adhesion burden and severity, duration and extent of adhesiolysis, conversion to open surgery, and adhesion-related postoperative complications. In a predefined subgroup of patients undergoing surgery for ventral hernia recurrence, the study also evaluates short-term postoperative outcomes, including chronic post-surgical pain, neuropathic pain features, sensory disturbances, and analgesic use. By prospectively collecting standardized intraoperative and postoperative data across multiple centres, the ORION study aims to provide real-world evidence on the long-term surgical and functional implications of mesh positioning in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair.