Clinical Research Directory

An Observational Clinical Study to Collect Photographic Data of Wounds With Hypergranulation to Aid Development of a Hypergranulation Clinical Endpoint and Assessment Tool, And Generate Participant Reported Data to Inform Trial Design

Hypergranulation (HG) is well documented and a known barrier to wound healing. Accurate clinical assessment of wounds is crucial in managing HG and evaluating treatment response. Currently there is no standardised assessment for healthcare professionals to assess the severity of HG. Through a modified Delphi process involving wound care clinical experts, a prototype Hypergranulation Tool has been developed to be used in clinical practice. The Hypergranulation Tool allows assessors to grade HG within wounds as mild, moderate and severe, based on 5 separate parameters. A prospective multi-site observational study based in the United Kingdom of 80-100 adult and paediatric patients with HG within venous leg ulcers (VLU) or complex surgical wounds (CSW) will allow performance testing of the Hypergranulation Tool. Study nurses will assess wounds with the Hypergranulation Tool across 2-4 clinic visits. Data from the use of the tool will be compared with quantitative 3D analysis of the wounds, patient reported outcome and patient interview data, to help determine the validity of the Hypergranulation Tool in the clinical setting. Results from the Observational Study will inform design changes to the Hyergranulation Tool as well as the design of future HG intervention trials.

Clinical Impact of Surgical Wound Morbidity According to the Type of Saphenous Vein Harvesting Technique (Endoscopic vs. Open) in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Revascularization Surgery

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different techniques: endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting versus conventional open harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, either alone or in combination with another cardiac surgical procedure (valve surgery or arrhythmia surgery). The main questions the trial aims to answer are: Does the endoscopic technique reduce surgical wound morbidity in terms of shorter hospital stays? Does endoscopic saphenous harvesting reduce the use of antibiotics for saphenectomy wound infections? Does the endoscopic technique reduce need for wound dressings due to necrosis and/or wound infection, and reduce need for analgesic treatment for wound pain? This prospective, randomized study will be conducted in the Cardiovascular Surgery Service at Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Participants will be randomly assigned to a different saphenectomy technique. All patients will be assessed for saphenectomy wound complications upon discharge, and by phone call at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months following the intervention.