Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT07383571
NA

Oral Hyoscine vs. Topical EMLA vs. Placebo for Pain Reduction During Hysterosalpingography

Sponsor: Cairo University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, will evaluate whether oral hyoscine butylbromide or topical eutectic lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography (HSG) compared with placebo

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Oral Hyoscine Butylbromide Versus Topical EMLA Spray in Reducing Pain During Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

Any - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

102

Start Date

2025-10-03

Completion Date

2026-03-30

Last Updated

2026-02-03

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DRUG

Oral Hyoscine butylbromide and Placebo Spray

Hyoscine butylbromide 20 mg oral tablet, single dose 30 min before HSG PLUS placebo cervical spray

DRUG

Topical EMLA Spray and Placebo Oral Tablet

EMLA spray (lidocaine 2.5% + prilocaine 2.5%), 3 sprays to ectocervix/external os, 10 min before HSG plus placebo oral tablet

OTHER

Double Placebo

oral placebo tablet plus placebo cervical spray

Locations (1)

Al Gezeera Hospital

Giza, Egypt